科研速览 · Science Skim继续刷下去 · Keep skimming →
◆ Analytical Chemistry2025-11-06· Chemistry

Not One Method to Rule Them All: A Comparative Study of Chromatographic Platforms (RP-LC-, HILIC-, SFC-, and IC-HRMS) for Water Analysis

Jonathan Zweigle, Michael P. Schlüsener, Joana Flottmann, Tobias Bader, Nanna Hjort Vidkjær, Ulla E. Bollmann, Jan H. Christensen, Selina Tisler

原始摘要(英文原文)· Original abstract
High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide Reversed-phase liquid chromatography coupled to high-resolution mass spectrometry (RP-LC-HRMS) is the standard for nontarget screening (NTS) of environmental samples but lacks retention of highly polar contaminants. We compared 12 chromatographic methods across four platforms, RP-LC, anion chromatography (IC), supercritical fluid chromatography (SFC), and hydrophilic interaction chromatography (HILIC), using 127 environmentally relevant compounds (log D pH7.4 −5.6 to 6.6). Compounds were analyzed in solvent and for a polar subset, in groundwater enriched by vacuum evaporation. Data were collected across four laboratories using 5 RP-LC-, 3 HILIC-, 2 SFC-, and 2 IC-HRMS setups. Feature detection with standard tools yielded more false negatives for SFC and IC. To enable a fair and method-agnostic comparison, an extracted ion chromatogram (EIC)-based workflow was used. Of the 127 compounds, 125 were detected by at least one platform. For log D pH7.4 > 0, RP-LC covered ∼90%, followed by SFC (∼70%), while IC and HILIC each covered <30%. For very polar compounds (log D pH7.4 < 0), coverage dropped across all platforms. SFC and HILIC detected up to 60% of polar analytes; IC performed better in negative ionization mode, consistent with anion-exchange separation. Detection frequency declined with polarity, reflecting analytical limitations. Combining RP-LC with either SFC or HILIC increased coverage to 94%. In spiked groundwater, coverage was lower (73%) due to matrix effects and losses during vacuum enrichment. Peak widths were narrowest for SFC (∼2.5 s) and RP-LC (∼4 s) and broadest for HILIC (∼7 s) and IC (∼17 s). Retention times showed limited cross-platform correlation while ionization efficiency was consistent, except for SFC. As no single method provided full coverage, combining RP-LC with one complementary platform (SFC, HILIC, or IC) is required to extend chemical space in environmental NTS.
读原文 · Read the paper ↗

AI 追问PRO

登录后使用 AI 追问

讨论区

登录后参与讨论

相关论文 · Related

Not One Method to Rule Them All: A Comparative Study of Chromatographic Platforms (RP-LC-, HILIC-, SFC-, and IC-HRMS) for Water Analysis — 科研速览 Science Skim