科研速览 · Science Skim继续刷下去 · Keep skimming →
◆ Signal transduction and targeted therapy2026-09-10

A randomized, double-blind, active-controlled phase 3 multicenter trial of rHSA for cirrhotic ascites.

Jidong Jia, Yajun An, Xiaojuan Ou, Weijia Duan, Yongzhong Li, Yong Deng, Jun Xie, Qinghai Wang, Xing Li, Zhongwei Pan, Yawen Luo, Lijia Wang, Xuanfang Zhong, Dajun Wu, Zhongji Meng, Zhirong Liu, Zonghua Chen, Liang Hong, Yali Zong, Yingmei Tang, Lihua Zhong, Cheng Wo, Bin Xu, Baolian Shu, Fei Shi, Guangming Li, Guangming Xiao, Fengqian Song, Guoqiang Zhang, Haiyan Chen, Aijun Liao, Hongjian Wei, Junyi Li, Xuan An, Fangfang Li, Chenwei Pan, Jie Pan, Zhanzhou Lin, Wei Hou, Hong Li, Jianyong Chen, Xiaoping Wu, Shuilin Sun, Yueming Shen, Xiaoqu Zhu, Bin Chen, Yuehong Zeng, Xingguo Xiao, Jiawei Geng, Heng Zhang, Caiyan Zhao, Lu Chen, Qinfang Wu, Yang Li, Xiongxiang Liu, Xueqiang Jiang, Hui Tian, Zhongkuo Li, Ming Zhao, Huai Li, Xiaobo Xiong, Rui Yao, Li Shao, Fengzhu Liu, Lirong Fu, Youwei Liao, Tao Guan, Xinhua Luo, Wenfang Yuan, Hongbo Ji, Xiaolin Zhou, Yongzhang Luo

原始摘要(英文原文)· Original abstract
In this multicenter, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled phase 3 trial (NCT06553456), we assessed the equivalence of recombinant human serum albumin (rHSA) expressed in Pichia pastoris to plasma-derived human serum albumin (pHSA) for elevating serum albumin (ALB) levels and non-inferiority regarding ascites improvement in patients with cirrhotic ascites. Using a rigorous dual-endpoint design, the primary endpoint was the change from baseline in serum ALB immediately after the final intravenous infusion. The key secondary endpoint was the ascites improvement rate after the final administration. Ultimately, 364 out of 390 patients completed the study. Statistical equivalence was established for the primary endpoint, with least-squares mean ALB changes of 11.16 ± 0.364 g/L (rHSA) and 10.95 ± 0.395 g/L (pHSA) (LSM difference: 0.21 g/L [95% CI: -0.75, 1.16]). For the secondary endpoint, ascites improvement was non-inferior, demonstrating a 58.0% response rate for rHSA versus 48.7% for pHSA (difference: 9.4% [95% CI: -0.56%, 19.10%]). Both endpoints of the trial were successfully achieved. The overall incidence of adverse events was similar in the two groups; crucially, no anti-drug antibodies were detected in the rHSA group. Exploratory analysis revealed that rHSA significantly reduced glycated ALB (-12.24%), whereas pHSA increased it ( + 12.52%) (P < 0.001). Corroborated by LC‒MS characterization, silver-staining purity assessment, and four biochemical quality attributes (free thiol, Hcy, AGEs, and carbonyl levels), this divergence highlights the preserved molecular integrity of rHSA. This trial demonstrated that in patients with cirrhotic ascites, rHSA was statistically equivalent to pHSA in elevating serum ALB and non-inferior in ascites improvement, with a favorable safety profile.
读原文 · Read the paper ↗

AI 追问PRO

登录后使用 AI 追问

讨论区

登录后参与讨论

相关论文 · Related

A randomized, double-blind, active-controlled phase 3 multicenter trial of rHSA for cirrhotic ascites. — 科研速览 Science Skim