Afonso Luiz Tavares de Albuquerque, Caroline de Paula Coutinho Vaz de Lira, José Nilo de Carvalho Neto, Rodrigo Rufino Pereira Silva, Iremar Salviano de Macedo Neto, Dário Celestino Sobral Filho
MBBB is associated with more severe myocardial and conduction system impairment compared to SBBB, supporting its role as a marker of worse prognosis.
BACKGROUND: Maskerading bundle branch block (MBBB) is a rare variant of standard bifascicular bundle branch block (SBBB), associated with poor prognosis and a higher need for pacemaker implantation. Most available data are limited to case reports and reviews.
METHODS: In this prospective cross-sectional study, we evaluated 27 patients with MBBB (Group I) and 18 with SBBB (Group II), all undergoing echocardiography, 24-h Holter monitoring, and invasive electrophysiological study (EPS) after recruitment.
RESULTS: Group I patients had worse functional status (NYHA III-IV), larger ventricular diameters, and lower ejection fraction. The HV interval was significantly longer in Group I (66.3 ± 18.3 vs. 52.9 ± 8.1 ms; p = 0.006). Pacemaker implantation was required in 48% of Group I patients versus none in Group II (p = 0.001). Persistent atrial fibrillation was also more frequent in Group I (39.5% vs. 16.6%; p = 0.018).
CONCLUSION: MBBB is associated with more severe myocardial and conduction system impairment compared to SBBB, supporting its role as a marker of worse prognosis.