科研速览 · Science Skim继续刷下去 · Keep skimming →
◆ Value in health regional issues2026-08-07

Cost-Utility Analysis of Sentinel Node Biopsy Versus Selective Neck Dissection for Node-Negative Early-Stage Oral Cancers: A Health Economic Evaluation from the Indian Healthcare System Perspective.

Krishnakumar Thankappan, Lakshmi Ravunniarth Menon, Tejal Patel, Sujha Subramanian, Subramania Iyer

一句话结论 · In one sentence

SNB is a cost-effective alternative to SND for clinically node-negative early-stage oral cancer in Indian tertiary cancer centers with appropriate technical expertise, dominating in the deterministic base case and remaining cost-effective in 78.5% of probabilistic iterations at the India-specific threshold. These findings support adoption of SNB as the preferred staging strategy at such centers.

原始摘要(英文原文)· Original abstract
OBJECTIVES: To conduct a cost-utility analysis comparing sentinel node biopsy (SNB) with selective neck dissection (SND) for clinically node-negative early-stage oral cancer from the Indian healthcare system perspective. METHODS: A hybrid decision-tree-Markov model compared SNB with SND over a 10-year horizon, incorporating 18 clinical pathways, time-trade-off utilities from an Indian population, and costs from Indian settings. Model and R code construction were assisted by a large language model (Claude-3.5-Sonnet) with author verification. Effectiveness was measured in quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted. The primary outcome was net monetary benefit at the India-specific willingness-to-pay threshold of INR 212 307/QALY. RESULTS: SNB yielded 6.145 QALYs versus 6.032 for SND (incremental 0.114) at INR 332 865 versus INR 336 433 (incremental -INR 3568). SNB dominated SND in the deterministic base case. Under probabilistic sensitivity analysis, SNB was cost-effective in 78.5% of iterations at the India-specific threshold (mean incremental net monetary benefit INR 15 944; 95% CrI -INR 22 141 to INR 54 287) and 81.8% at 1× gross domestic product per capita (INR 245 000/QALY). A lifetime-horizon scenario (cohort age 55-100; 45 cycles) confirmed SNB dominance with incremental cost -INR 5466 and incremental QALYs 0.1767. Results were robust across deterministic and scenario analyses. CONCLUSIONS: SNB is a cost-effective alternative to SND for clinically node-negative early-stage oral cancer in Indian tertiary cancer centers with appropriate technical expertise, dominating in the deterministic base case and remaining cost-effective in 78.5% of probabilistic iterations at the India-specific threshold. These findings support adoption of SNB as the preferred staging strategy at such centers.
读原文 · Read the paper ↗

AI 追问PRO

登录后使用 AI 追问

讨论区

登录后参与讨论

相关论文 · Related

Cost-Utility Analysis of Sentinel Node Biopsy Versus Selective Neck Dissection for Node-Negative Early-Stage Oral Cancers: A Health Economic Evaluation from the Indian Healthcare System Perspective. — 科研速览 Science Skim