科研速览 · Science Skim继续刷下去 · Keep skimming →
◆ Seminars in oncology nursing2026-08-17

The Invisible Workforce: An Algorithmic Audit of Nursing, Primary Care, and Holistic Gaps in AI-Generated Survivorship Plans.

Muhammed İnan, Serra Akar İnan, Gonca Bumin, Cenk Aypak

一句话结论 · In one sentence

LLMs demonstrate high biomedical content coverage but systematically underrepresent holistic care professionals. The functional presence of nursing content without professional visibility highlights algorithmic bias. Unsupervised LLM use risks fragmented survivorship guidance, necessitating "nurse-in-the-loop" validation workflows to correct attribution gaps and calibrate literacy levels.

原始摘要(英文原文)· Original abstract
OBJECTIVES: Advanced ovarian cancer survivorship requires multidisciplinary coordination. As patients use large language models (LLMs) as clinical navigators, essential professional roles may be inconsistently represented. This study evaluates the comprehensiveness, professional attribution, and readability of LLM-generated survivorship plans. METHODS: An algorithmic audit (N = 50) queried ChatGPT-5.1 using a standardized persona: a 58-year-old advanced ovarian cancer survivor. A dual-layer content analysis assessed nine guideline-derived domains, distinguishing explicit professional attribution from implicit functional guidance. A Nursing Function Layer quantified implicit nursing content. Readability was measured via the Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level. RESULTS: Medical Oncology achieved 100% explicit attribution. Conversely, Primary Care was explicitly referenced in 2% (implicit: 14%), Genetic Counseling in 0%, and Nursing in 14% (implicit: 80%), revealing a 66-point attribution gap. Despite low explicit professional attribution, nursing-relevant functional content appeared in 96% of responses (mean = 4.16 functions/response). Responses averaged an 11.57 Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level, substantially exceeding the sixth- to eighth-grade literacy benchmark. CONCLUSIONS: LLMs demonstrate high biomedical content coverage but systematically underrepresent holistic care professionals. The functional presence of nursing content without professional visibility highlights algorithmic bias. Unsupervised LLM use risks fragmented survivorship guidance, necessitating "nurse-in-the-loop" validation workflows to correct attribution gaps and calibrate literacy levels. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE: AI-generated survivorship plans reflect a purely biomedical focus, systematically omitting primary care integration (2%) and explicit nursing roles (14%). This structural fragmentation necessitates "nurse-in-the-loop" workflows, positioning oncology nurses to actively review AI outputs, activate neglected primary care referrals for comorbidity management, and calibrate reading difficulty to safe patient literacy levels.
读原文 · Read the paper ↗

AI 追问PRO

登录后使用 AI 追问

讨论区

登录后参与讨论

相关论文 · Related

The Invisible Workforce: An Algorithmic Audit of Nursing, Primary Care, and Holistic Gaps in AI-Generated Survivorship Plans. — 科研速览 Science Skim