Marilyn Cox, Mario Levesque
Persistent, unexplained symptoms attributed by patients to Lyme disease present significant challenges within healthcare systems where diagnostic uncertainty and contested legitimacy shape clinical and institutional responses. This qualitative study draws on in-depth interviews with individuals in Nova Scotia who experience persistent symptoms following suspected or confirmed Lyme disease. Using an interpretive phenomenological approach informed by the embodied health movement framework, the analysis examines how participants interpreted their experiences and navigated interactions with healthcare and public health systems. Participants described complex diagnostic and treatment trajectories shaped by perceived testing limitations, inconsistent clinical interpretations, and limited recognition of persistent symptoms. These dynamics contributed to feelings of dismissal and uncertainty, prompting many to seek additional opinions, pursue alternative care, or engage in self-advocacy. As these struggles unfolded, participants reported broader disruptions to daily life, including shifts in family roles, relationship strain, and reduced functional capacity. Institutional messaging and jurisdictional constraints further shaped their sense of legitimacy within the healthcare system, while community networks and peer support offered crucial validation and interpretive resources. For some, these engagements extended into advocacy and public education aimed at improving recognition and care. The findings illustrate how individuals navigate the intersecting domains of embodied experience, biomedical uncertainty, and institutional structures, and how experiential knowledge becomes a resource in the absence of clear clinical consensus. This study contributes to broader discussions about contested illness, the politics of visibility, and the need for responsive, context-sensitive approaches to Lyme disease policy, communication, and care.