科研速览 · Science Skim继续刷下去 · Keep skimming →
◆ Results in Engineering2025-10-30· Flood myth

Flood risk assessment of cultural heritage sites near lakes via advanced hydrodynamic modeling and digital technologies

Marcos Julien Alexopoulos, Theano Iliopoulou, Paraskevi Mode, Denis Istrati, Demetris Koutsoyiannis, Sławomir Królewicz, Renata Graf, Łukasz Kaczmarek, Włodzimierz Rączkowski

原始摘要(英文原文)· Original abstract
• Integrated drone photogrammetry and LiDAR in HEC-RAS 2D RoG for flood lake modeling. • Omitting bathymetry underestimates peak flows in moderate storms. • Margin-to-failure analysis confirms site resilience under worst-case lake rise. • Multiscale framework lays groundwork for emerging technologies in heritage management. Cultural heritage flood risk assessments demand high-resolution, physics-based modeling frameworks capable of capturing complex terrain in diverse hydrological environments, and the subtle dynamics that threaten the relics. This study develops and applies such a framework at the lakeside archaeological site of Smuszewo, Poland, where flood hazards could arise from a combination of overland runoff and dynamic lake-stage fluctuations. To this end, we applied a high-resolution modeling approach combining overland terrain obtained via LiDAR and drone photogrammetry, and a digitized lake bathymetric model, within a HEC-RAS 2D Rain-on-Grid framework that enables detailed simulation of runoff–lake interactions and site-specific flood scenarios across design storms. We evaluate three scenarios: (i) model calibration using a five-day rainfall-stage event, (ii) the hydraulic impact of including versus omitting explicit lake bathymetry, across five design storms (1–50-year return periods); and (iii) a margin-to-failure analysis simulating lake-level rise from 0.00 to +1.50 m. Results show that omitting bathymetry underestimates peak flows for frequent storms due to artificial ponding on flat, dry-initiated surfaces (vs. realistic depths and wet cells enabling accurate volume propagation), whereas impact diminishes for the higher return periods. However, even under the worst-case scenario, an extreme storm on top of a +1.5 m lake-stage rise, more than 1 m of freeboard remains. Our findings demonstrate the critical role of multiscale, high-resolution terrain and physics-driven methods—and lay the groundwork for future digital-twin implementations, predictive maintenance strategies, and cloud-based simulations in cultural heritage flood-risk management.
读原文 · Read the paper ↗

AI 追问PRO

登录后使用 AI 追问

讨论区

登录后参与讨论

相关论文 · Related

Flood risk assessment of cultural heritage sites near lakes via advanced hydrodynamic modeling and digital technologies — 科研速览 Science Skim