科研速览 · Science Skim继续刷下去 · Keep skimming →
◆ Regenerative Therapy2026-05-01· Medicine

Stimuli-responsive 4D-bioprinted constructs for musculoskeletal tissue regeneration: Shape-morphing mechanisms, cell-laden bioink engineering, and preclinical outcomes

Suleiman Ibrahim Mohammad, Asokan Vasudevan, Jasgurpreet Singh Chohan, Ahmed F. Salman, Manveet Singh, Ripendeep Singh, Pardeep Singh Bains, Parvoz Abdulkhakimov, Mohammad Ebrahim Astaneh, Narges Fereydouni

原始摘要(英文原文)· Original abstract
Introduction: Musculoskeletal disorders impose a substantial global disability burden. Conventional 3D bioprinting cannot replicate the dynamic, anisotropic architecture of bone, cartilage, skeletal muscle, and cardiac muscle. Four-dimensional (4D) bioprinting addresses this by integrating stimuli-responsive materials into constructs, enabling programmed shape transformation and adaptive behavior following implantation. Methods: This narrative review examines primary experimental research on stimuli-responsive 4D-bioprinted musculoskeletal constructs, drawing on in vitro, in vivo, and combined outcomes from leading peer-reviewed journals. Results: Evidence spans four stimuli modalities - magnetic actuation, near-infrared (NIR) photothermal response, thermoresponsive swelling-shrinking transitions, and shape memory polymer (SMP) recovery - applied across bone, cartilage, skeletal muscle, and cardiac constructs. Bioink formulations from silk fibroin-gelatin composites and alginate-polydopamine inks to GelMA-based hydrogels and polyester SMPs present trade-offs between printability, shape fidelity, and cellular compatibility. Cross-study synthesis identifies stiffness trajectory, architectural anisotropy, and dynamic deformation as primary mechano-biological axes directing cell fate decisions. Preclinical studies document encouraging ossification and chondrogenesis outcomes, though constructs fall short of native tissue mechanical benchmarks. Conclusion: Translational barriers range from fundamental physical constraints - including the mechanical performance gap and stimulus penetration depth limitations - to incremental engineering challenges amenable to near-term resolution. Passive hydration-driven deployment represents the most clinically tractable strategy, while multifunctional bioinks integrating stimuli-responsiveness, bioactive factor presentation, and cell-instructive surface chemistry define the primary material development direction.
读原文 · Read the paper ↗

AI 追问PRO

登录后使用 AI 追问

讨论区

登录后参与讨论

相关论文 · Related

Stimuli-responsive 4D-bioprinted constructs for musculoskeletal tissue regeneration: Shape-morphing mechanisms, cell-laden bioink engineering, and preclinical outcomes — 科研速览 Science Skim