Impact of the Korean Medical-Political Conflict on Septic Shock Care in the Emergency Department: A Retrospective Single-Center Clinical Analysis.

Background and Objectives: The 2024 Korean medical-political conflict caused the mass resignation of trainee physicians, raising concerns about the quality of care for time-critical emergencies. This study aimed to assess the impact of workforce disruptions on the management and outcomes of adults presenting to the emergency department (ED) with septic shock. Materials and Methods: This retrospective single-center cohort study was conducted at a tertiary care ED and included adults with septic shock between September 2022 and August 2025. This study compared the pre-conflict period, operating under a resident-supported model, with the conflict period characterized by a specialist-led staffing model. The primary outcome was the all-cause in-hospital mortality. The secondary outcomes included process-related time intervals and clinical course measurements. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify the independent predictors of mortality. Results: Altogether, 343 patients were included (159 pre-conflict, 184 conflict). During the conflict, ED crowding significantly decreased (average concurrent ED patients: 14.9 vs. 7.6, p < 0.001). Key diagnostic process metrics, including time to blood gas analysis, blood sampling, blood culture, computed tomography, and total ED length of stay, were significantly shortened. Time-critical therapeutic intervals, such as time to empirical antibiotics, remained unchanged. In-hospital mortality did not differ significantly between the pre- and conflict periods. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that the conflict period was not independently associated with mortality; only initial serum lactate levels and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II scores remained significant predictors. Conclusions: The 2024 Korean medical-political conflict was not associated with increased in-hospital mortality among patients with septic shock. Process-related metrics improved, while key therapeutic intervals and overall clinical outcomes remained stable. These findings may reflect reduced ED crowding, organizational adaptation, and continued adherence to established septic shock management practices. Reduced ED volume likely contributed substantially to improvements in diagnostic and throughput-related processes.