Horst E Lagos-Beitz, Alexa Borbolla-Ruíz, Wolfgang González-Sosa, Carlos A González-Quirós, Ricardo A Castillejos-Molina, Jorge A Alcacio-Mendoza, Gerardo Tena-Gonzalez Mendez
DRE was independently associated with csPCa in the absence of mpMRI, but its incremental discriminative contribution was modest and became negligible once PI-RADS was incorporated. These findings support a limited, context-dependent role for DRE in contemporary biopsy pathways.
OBJECTIVE: To quantify the context-dependent contribution of digital rectal examination (DRE) to the prediction of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa, International Society of Urological Pathology [ISUP] grade group ≥2) in a contemporary biopsy cohort, comparing a nonmultiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) clinical pathway with an mpMRI-informed pathway including prostate imaging-reporting and data system (PI-RADS).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 666 consecutive prostate biopsies at a single academic center (July 2017-December 2024). DRE was performed by urology residents and attending urologists. Two multivariable logistic regression models were constructed: Model A (full cohort, n = 612) included age, log-prostate-specific antigen (PSA), log-PSA density (PSAD), prior biopsy, and DRE; Model B (mpMRI subcohort, N = 306) additionally included PI-RADS score. Discrimination was assessed using area under the curve (AUC) and likelihood ratio tests. Sensitivity analyses evaluated any cancer (ISUP ≥1) and high-grade cancer (ISUP ≥4).
RESULTS: csPCa prevalence was 30.7% (202/660), and DRE was suspicious in 52.3% (346/662). In Model A, DRE was independently associated with csPCa (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.18, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.45-3.28, P < 0.001), although the gain in discrimination was modest (ΔAUC = 0.009). In Model B, DRE showed borderline significance (aOR, 1.88, 95% CI: 1.01-3.52, P = 0.048) with negligible discrimination gain (ΔAUC = 0.002). Sensitivity analyses showed consistent findings. A dose-response gradient was observed: csPCa rates were 19.2% (normal), 31.6% (cT2a), and 58.9% (cT2b-T4) (p-trend <0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: DRE was independently associated with csPCa in the absence of mpMRI, but its incremental discriminative contribution was modest and became negligible once PI-RADS was incorporated. These findings support a limited, context-dependent role for DRE in contemporary biopsy pathways.