Felipe Oviedo, Fiodar Kazhamiaka, Esha Choukse, Allen Kim, Amy Luers, Melanie Nakagawa, Ricardo Bianchini, Juan M. Lavista Ferres
As artificial intelligence (AI) inference scales to billions of queries, estimates of per-query energy use are increasingly important for capacity planning, efficiency interventions, and policy. Yet many public estimates assume non-production settings, leading to systematic overestimation. We introduce a bottom-up framework estimating inference energy from token throughput, node power, and overhead under large-scale deployment assumptions. For frontier-scale models (>200B parameters) on H100 nodes, we estimate a median energy of 0.31 Wh/query (interquartile range [IQR] 0.16–0.60), indicating that widely cited estimates are overstated by 4–20×. In test-time scaling scenarios 15× longer than typical queries, the median energy rises 13× to 3.91 Wh (IQR 2.15–7.05). Across models, serving systems, and hardware, we estimate 8–20× line-of-sight energy reductions. At data-center scale, serving 1 billion queries/day requires 0.7 GWh; if 10% are long queries, demand rises to 1.7 GWh/day. With efficiency interventions, it falls to 0.8 GWh/day, mitigating the energy impact of test-time scaling.