Masahiro Kodana, Kazuo Imai, Shintaro Ichimura, Erika Shimoda, Nanako Matsuzaki, Kana Ogane, Rina Takahashi, Toru Kawamura, Ryuha Omachi, Masaru Matsuoka, Takuya Maeda
Mycrium demonstrated high performance for GPC and GNR detection and may facilitate recognition of coexisting organism categories in polymicrobial positive blood cultures. However, the additional false-positive detections and lower sensitivity for GPR and yeast suggest that, at present, Mycrium should be used as a quality-support tool under MT review rather than a standalone replacement for expert microscopy.
BACKGROUND: Gram staining of positive blood culture bottles provides rapid information for antimicrobial decision-making. This study evaluated the clinical performance and discordance profile of Mycrium, an automated Gram staining and artificial intelligence-based image analysis system, for positive blood culture specimens.
METHODS: We evaluated 231 positive blood culture bottles at Saitama Medical University Hospital. After excluding 2 culture-negative false-positive bottles, 229 culture-positive bottles (208 monomicrobial and 21 polymicrobial) were included in the analysis. Mycrium outputs for Gram stain categories-Gram-positive cocci (GPC), Gram-positive rods (GPR), Gram-negative rods (GNR), and yeast-were compared with routine microscopy performed by a medical technologist (MT) and culture-based organism identification.
RESULTS: Among the monomicrobial bottles, category-level sensitivity was 97.2% for GPC, 94.4% for GNR, 63.2% for GPR, and 60.0% for yeast. Specificity was 86.0% for GPC, 98.5% for GNR, 97.4% for GPR, and 94.9% for yeast. Among the polymicrobial bottles, complete category agreement without additional false-positive detections was achieved in 13/21 bottles (61.9%). Notably, Mycrium identified reference organism categories that were not reported by routine MT microscopy in 4 polymicrobial bottles.
CONCLUSIONS: Mycrium demonstrated high performance for GPC and GNR detection and may facilitate recognition of coexisting organism categories in polymicrobial positive blood cultures. However, the additional false-positive detections and lower sensitivity for GPR and yeast suggest that, at present, Mycrium should be used as a quality-support tool under MT review rather than a standalone replacement for expert microscopy.