科研速览 · Science Skim继续刷下去 · Keep skimming →
◆ Journal of hepatology2026-09-26

Multi-target blood test for hepatocellular carcinoma early detection: a cross-sectional analysis of the prospective ALTUS study.

Binu V John, Mark Camardo, Amit G Singal, Neehar D Parikh, Ju Dong Yang, Lewis R Roberts, Alvin C Silva, Naga Chalasani, Reena Salgia, John B Kisiel, Kyle Porter, Paul Z Elias, Elle Kielar-Grevstad, Janelle J Bruinsma, Marilyn C Olson, Jorge Garces, Paul J Limburg

一句话结论 · In one sentence

The mt-HBT had higher observed sensitivity than ultrasound for early-stage HCC, with a paired absolute difference of 44.4% (95% CI, 20.2-63.8); however, specificity did not meet the prespecified target.

原始摘要(英文原文)· Original abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Globally, 350 million people are at risk for HCC. Ultrasound screening is recommended but is limited by poor early-stage sensitivity and low adherence. This study evaluated whether the multi-target HCC blood test (mt-HBT) demonstrates non-inferior sensitivity for early-stage HCC compared with ultrasound and assessed its specificity. METHODS: This prospective, multicenter study, conducted between July 2021 and June 2025 in the United States, evaluated the performance of the mt-HBT in a head-to-head comparison with standard-of-care ultrasound among adults with cirrhosis or chronic HBV infection who were eligible for routine HCC screening. All participants underwent computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging as a reference standard. The co-primary outcomes were non-inferiority of mt-HBT to ultrasound for early-stage HCC sensitivity, with sequential testing of superiority, and mt-HBT specificity. A secondary outcome was overall (any-stage) mt-HBT sensitivity. RESULTS: Of 3089 participants, 2293 were evaluable with paired ultrasound and mt-HBT results. Thirty-seven HCCs were identified, with 27 classified as early stage by Milan criteria. Early-stage HCC sensitivities were 66.7% (95% CI, 47.8-81.4%) for mt-HBT and 22.2% (95% CI, 10.6-40.8%) for ultrasound, confirming mt-HBT non-inferiority within the prespecified 5% margin. The specificity for mt-HBT was 81.8% (95% CI, 80.1-83.4%), which did not meet the pre-specified co-primary outcome of 82%. Ultrasound specificity was 98.6% (95% CI, 98.0-99.0%). Any-stage HCC sensitivity was 73.0% (95% CI, 57.0-84.6%) for mt-HBT and 29.7% (95% CI, 17.5-45.8%) for ultrasound. No serious adverse events occurred during the blood collection process. CONCLUSIONS: The mt-HBT had higher observed sensitivity than ultrasound for early-stage HCC, with a paired absolute difference of 44.4% (95% CI, 20.2-63.8); however, specificity did not meet the prespecified target. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05064553) IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS: HCC screening remains limited by the suboptimal sensitivity of ultrasound, particularly among patients with obesity and steatotic liver disease. In this prospective multicenter study, a multi-target HCC blood test demonstrated substantially higher sensitivity for early-stage HCC detection than ultrasound while maintaining favorable screening performance across diverse patient subgroups. These findings are important for clinicians, researchers, and patients because they support further evaluation of blood-based approaches to address known limitations of imaging-based screening.
读原文 · Read the paper ↗

AI 追问PRO

登录后使用 AI 追问

讨论区

登录后参与讨论

相关论文 · Related

Multi-target blood test for hepatocellular carcinoma early detection: a cross-sectional analysis of the prospective ALTUS study. — 科研速览 Science Skim