科研速览 · Science Skim继续刷下去 · Keep skimming →
◆ Emergency medicine international2026-01-01

Interrater Agreement Between Paramedic CTAS Scores and an Electronic CTAS Tool: A Retrospective Study Across Eastern Ontario.

Michael Slatter, Pria Nippak, Nadia Nandlall, Housne Begum, Julie Sinclair, Thula Kandasamy, Ben De Mendonca

一句话结论 · In one sentence

This study found near-perfect agreement between paramedic documentation and the paramedic smartphone application for CTAS-1 in acute patients, with moderate agreement for other levels. Further studies should include multiple raters to better understand the implications of using a smartphone application.

原始摘要(英文原文)· Original abstract
OBJECTIVES: To assess interrater agreement between the Canadian triage and acuity scale (CTAS) scores assigned by paramedics and those assigned by a paramedic rater using an electronic smartphone application, aiming to identify training gaps and potential patient safety risks associated with CTAS scoring in Canadian hospital emergency departments (CEDs). METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted using 192,326 CTAS-level call data collected from electronic patient care records of nine paramedic services. Data were entered into an electronic CTAS smartphone app. The calls were categorized based on contact level and the sample size. Minitab software and VassarStats were used to calculate the quadratic-weighted Cohen's kappa (k) coefficient. RESULTS: A retrospective analysis of 1651 paramedic call reports from across Eastern Ontario compared paramedic-assigned CTAS scores with those generated using an eCTAS smartphone tool. Overall agreement between raters was substantial (k = 0.78), with 55.24% (95% CI: 52.8, 57.66) agreement for CTAS on contact and 52.88% (95% CI: 50.44, 55.31) for CTAS on departure (k = 0.76). Paramedics assigned more low-acuity CTAS 4-5 scores than the eCTAS tool on both contact (39% vs. 31%) and departure (40% vs. 31%). Additionally, 11%-12% of CTAS 2 calls were downgraded by paramedics to CTAS 4 or 5, compared with 7% when eCTAS was used. Cohen's kappa demonstrated near-perfect agreement for CTAS 1 scores, fair agreement for CTAS 2 and 3, slight agreement for CTAS 4, and moderate agreement for CTAS 5 categories. Complaint-specific analyses showed the greatest disagreement in the gastrointestinal and substance overdose/misuse categories. CONCLUSIONS: This study found near-perfect agreement between paramedic documentation and the paramedic smartphone application for CTAS-1 in acute patients, with moderate agreement for other levels. Further studies should include multiple raters to better understand the implications of using a smartphone application.
读原文 · Read the paper ↗

AI 追问PRO

登录后使用 AI 追问

讨论区

登录后参与讨论

相关论文 · Related

Interrater Agreement Between Paramedic CTAS Scores and an Electronic CTAS Tool: A Retrospective Study Across Eastern Ontario. — 科研速览 Science Skim