Abdulaziz Aldawish, Sivakumar Kulasegaram, Ayman Almutlaqah, Abdullah Alshahrani
The maturity method (ASTM C1074) predicts in situ concrete strength from a recorded temperature history but assumes a constant apparent activation energy, contradicting the experimental evidence that the activation energy falls as hydration shifts from kinetics control to diffusion control-an effect that differs between binder chemistries when supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs) are used. This study develops a physics-based maturity model in which the apparent activation energy varies linearly with temperature, Q(T) = Q0 + βQ(T - Tref), coupling a variable-energy Arrhenius equivalent age to a hyperbolic strength-maturity relationship. The model was calibrated on 196 mean-strength observations (588 cube tests) from seven self-compacting concrete mixtures cured isothermally at 10, 20, 35 and 50 °C and tested at seven ages (1-90 days). All four SCM systems (fly ash, GGBS, silica fume and rice husk ash) returned a negative coefficient (-210 to -974), enclosing the temperature sensitivity implied by independent calorimetric measurements on Portland cement paste (≈-580 J/(mol·K)), whereas the ordinary Portland cement control returned a positive point estimate (+101) that is not statistically distinguishable from zero. The model achieved R2 = 0.929 (RMSE = 4.74 MPa), outperforming the constant-energy ASTM C1074 baseline in both accuracy and the Akaike Information Criterion while eliminating its systematic bias at the temperature extremes. Five-fold cross-validation confirms the out-of-sample accuracy (R2 = 0.901, RMSE = 5.59 MPa), and bootstrap analysis shows the negative coefficients of the fly ash, GGBS and rice husk ash systems to be statistically significant. External validation on 120 independent literature observations gave R2 = 0.881.