Nathalia Costa Monteiro, Laís Prado Smith Lima, João Paulo Almeida Freitas, Maria de Lourdes Passos Machado, Fernanda Gonçalves Gama, Victória Dayane Santos Silva, Leonardo Machado Martins, Sophia de Santana Ferreira Lemos, Gutemberg Lemos Torres, Danielle Góes da Silva, Mariana Garcez Varela, Talita Letícia Trevisan, Mônica Sueli Vilela da Mota Silveira, Bruno Fernandes de Oliveira Santos, Nathalie Oliveira de Santana
CGM implementation reduced diabetes distress, particularly severe cases, and improved glycemic parameters in a resource-limited setting. The improvement in well-being independent of glycemic drop suggests that CGM is a valuable tool for both clinical and psychosocial management of adults with T1D in public health systems.
OBJECTIVES: While technology improves glycemic control, its psychological impact in resource-limited settings is less explored. This study evaluated the impact of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) on diabetes distress and glycemic outcomes in adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D) within a public healthcare system.
METHODS: This prospective study enrolled 35 adults with T1D at a public center in Northeastern Brazil. Participants initiated CGM with monthly follow-ups. Diabetes distress was assessed at baseline and six months using Brazilian Type 1 Diabetes Distress Scale (T1DDS).
RESULTS: Participants had a mean T1D duration of 13 ± 9.9 years and baseline HbA1c of 9.13 ± 1.87%. After six months, mean HbA1c decreased to 7.94 ± 1.28% (mean difference = -1.19%; p = 0.007). Time in range reached 54.4% within the first month and remained consistent throughout the follow-up. Total diabetes distress score decreased significantly from 2.86 ± 0.88 at baseline to 2.32 ± 0.85 at six months (mean difference = -0.28; p < 0.001; Cohen's dz = 0.76). The proportion of participants with severe distress dropped from 34.3% (n=12) to 14.3% (n=5) (p = 0.002). Major improvements in management and family/social domains. Psychosocial benefits were observed regardless of the magnitude of HbA1c reduction (r = -0.182, p = 0.384).
CONCLUSIONS: CGM implementation reduced diabetes distress, particularly severe cases, and improved glycemic parameters in a resource-limited setting. The improvement in well-being independent of glycemic drop suggests that CGM is a valuable tool for both clinical and psychosocial management of adults with T1D in public health systems.