Marisa L Conte, Judith M Schlaeger, Guilherme Del Fiol, James R Campbell, Andrea L Cheville, Keith Marsolo, Kari A Stephens, Miriam O Ezenwa, Andrew D Boyd, Juanita E Darby, Nadine S Matthie, P Michael Ho, Alice Pressman, Morgan Justice, Carol Reynolds Geary, Keturah R Faurot, Alex Fist, Karen Staman, Hulin Wu, Rachel L Richesson
A range of issues and decisions influence how computable phenotypes are developed and used in pragmatic clinical trials. Multidisciplinary teams that understand the context of the data, including the reason the data are collected and potential sources of bias, are best suited for the development and validation of phenotypes for ePCTs.
OBJECTIVES: Embedded pragmatic clinical trials (ePCTs) are conducted as part of routine clinical care and therefore use data collected from real-world data sources, such as electronic health record systems and administrative claims. A common approach for using these types of data across all phases of trial conduct is to create a computable phenotype (an explicitly defined data query data, including specified data types, data codes, and logical parameters) to capture patients with a clinical condition, exposure, symptom, characteristic, treatment, or outcome of interest.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Electronic Health Record (EHR) Core Working Group of the NIH Pragmatic Trials Collaboratory captured the experiences of investigators in developing, adapting, and applying computable phenotype definitions in their studies.
RESULTS: Four case studies describe different approaches to developing and using computable phenotypes in pragmatic trials.
DISCUSSION: We recommend: (1) developing computable phenotypes as part of a team with multiple areas of expertise; (2) appropriate validation; (3) dissemination of salient details regarding phenotype creation; and (4) capturing and reporting any modifications made to phenotypes during the conduct of the trial.
CONCLUSION: A range of issues and decisions influence how computable phenotypes are developed and used in pragmatic clinical trials. Multidisciplinary teams that understand the context of the data, including the reason the data are collected and potential sources of bias, are best suited for the development and validation of phenotypes for ePCTs.