Kamran A Khan, Jason J Madan, George Bouliotis, Rowena Williams, Kerry Raynes, Nicole De Valliere, Maximillian Birchwood, Sarah Stewart-Brown, Patrick Olivier, Marie B H Yap, Glenn A Melvin, Paul Patterson, Andrew Thompson, Stavros Petrou
Over the 15-month trial horizon, the personalised parenting programme was associated with higher costs, a small and uncertain gain in QALYs, negative incremental net monetary benefit, and a low probability of being cost-effective at NICE-recommended willingness-to-pay thresholds.
BACKGROUND: Adolescent depression is associated with substantial health and economic burden. Preventive interventions that strengthen parenting skills show promise in reducing depressive symptoms and improving adolescent well-being. However, evidence on the cost-effectiveness of scalable online parenting interventions remains limited.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of an online personalised parenting (PP) programme - Partners in Parenting - designed to prevent affective disorders in high-risk adolescents, compared with a standard educational package.
METHODS: This trial-based economic evaluation was conducted alongside a randomised controlled trial of 512 parent-adolescent dyads (256 per arm). Analyses adopted UK public sector and societal perspectives over 15 months. Costs (2022-2023 GBP) were collected prospectively. Utilities from EQ-5D-Y and CHU9D were used to estimate quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). The base case used bivariate regression of costs and QALYs with multiple imputations under intention-to-treat. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios, net monetary benefits, and cost-effectiveness acceptability curves were estimated. Sensitivity analyses assessed robustness.
RESULTS: In the adjusted multiply imputed base-case analysis, mean incremental public-sector costs were £639 (95% CI £272 to £988) and mean incremental QALYs were 0.013 (95% CI -0.021 to 0.042), corresponding to a 13%-27% probability of cost-effectiveness at willingness-to-pay thresholds of £20,000-£30,000 per QALY. Complete-case analysis suggested lower costs and higher QALYs but with substantial uncertainty.
CONCLUSIONS: Over the 15-month trial horizon, the personalised parenting programme was associated with higher costs, a small and uncertain gain in QALYs, negative incremental net monetary benefit, and a low probability of being cost-effective at NICE-recommended willingness-to-pay thresholds.