科研速览 · Science Skim继续刷下去 · Keep skimming →
◆ Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine2026-01-01

Complications of pulsed-field ablation for atrial fibrillation: a narrative structured review.

Jiangyao Li, Jia Gao, Rui Wang

原始摘要(英文原文)· Original abstract
Pulsed-field ablation (PFA) has been adopted at remarkable speed as a non-thermal approach for pulmonary vein isolation in atrial fibrillation (AF). Its mechanism-irreversible electroporation-preferentially injures cardiomyocytes while theoretically sparing adjacent heat-sensitive structures. Landmark randomised trial data (ADVENT) and large prospective registries (MANIFEST-17K; MANIFEST-PF) confirm that PFA is non-inferior to conventional thermal ablation for arrhythmia freedom and carries an overall favourable safety profile, with particularly low rates of atrooesophageal fistula and pulmonary vein stenosis. Nonetheless, substituting electrical for thermal energy introduces a qualitatively distinct injury spectrum. Intravascular haemolysis, acute kidney injury, transient coronary vasospasm, phrenic nerve stimulation, silent cerebral emboli, and-importantly-the risk of ventricular fibrillation during unsynchronised pulse delivery have each been documented across prospective cohorts and multicentre registries. This review provides a narrative structured synthesis of mechanistic and clinical evidence for each PFA-associated complication, proposes a three-tier classification (PFA-specific, PFA-enriched, and general ablation-related), and outlines practical risk-mitigation strategies. Recognition that "non-thermal" does not equate to "risk-free" is essential as PFA transitions to standard of care.
读原文 · Read the paper ↗

AI 追问PRO

登录后使用 AI 追问

讨论区

登录后参与讨论

相关论文 · Related

Complications of pulsed-field ablation for atrial fibrillation: a narrative structured review. — 科研速览 Science Skim