科研速览 · Science Skim继续刷下去 · Keep skimming →
◆ International Journal of Infectious Diseases2026-06-02· Efavirenz

Efavirenz 400 vs 600 mg combined with lamivudine and tenofovir in treatment-naïve HIV-infected patients in China: A randomized, multi-centered, controlled trial

Qi Hang, Wang Ziyan, Song Xiaojing, Wang Min, Ding Haibo, Ye Hanhui, Zhihao Meng, He Shenghua, He Yun, Li Linghua, Shen Yinzhong, Xiong Yong, Ma Ping, Li Taisheng

原始摘要(英文原文)· Original abstract
BACKGROUND: Optimizing efavirenz (EFV) dosing to minimize adverse events (AEs) remains a critical issue. Studies indicate that reducing the EFV dose from 600 to 400 mg daily lowers side effect intensity while maintaining virological suppression. We previously showed that 600 mg daily EFV may lead to unnecessarily high exposure in Chinese patients, but the long-term efficacy and safety of dose reduction beyond 48 weeks in this population remain unknown. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, randomized controlled trial comparing EFV 400 vs 600 mg, each combined with lamivudine (3TC) and tenofovir (TDF), in antiretroviral therapy-naïve Chinese adults with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-1. The primary endpoint was virological suppression (HIV-ribonucleic acid [RNA] <50 copies/ml) at week 72. A total of 422 participants were randomized (215 in the 400 mg group, 207 in the 600 mg group); 334 (169 and 165, respectively) completed the week 72 primary endpoint assessment, while an optional extension to week 96 was conducted for exploratory analyses. RESULTS: At baseline, demographic and clinical characteristics were comparable between groups. At week 72, virological suppression (HIV-RNA <50 copies/ml) was achieved in 86.5% (186/215) of the EFV 400 mg group and 84.1% (174/207) of the EFV 600 mg group (difference +2.5 percentage points, 95% confidence interval -4.3 to 9.2, P = 0.57), meeting the noninferiority criteria. While overall AE profiles were comparable, the EFV 600 mg group exhibited a significantly higher incidence of serious nonrash AEs (P = 0.042), and a numerically higher but nonsignificant rate of drug discontinuation due to AEs (4.8% vs 1.9%, P = 0.094). CONCLUSION: EFV 400 mg is noninferior to EFV 600 mg in treatment-naïve Chinese patients over 72 weeks, offering improved safety and tolerability. TRIAL REGISTRATION: #NCT04463784 on ClinicalTrials.gov, Registered by Peking Union Medical College Hospital on April 1, 2018 (URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04463784).
读原文 · Read the paper ↗

AI 追问PRO

登录后使用 AI 追问

讨论区

登录后参与讨论

相关论文 · Related

Efavirenz 400 vs 600 mg combined with lamivudine and tenofovir in treatment-naïve HIV-infected patients in China: A randomized, multi-centered, controlled trial — 科研速览 Science Skim