Kooshan Amini, Tanmoy Palit, Abigail L. Beck, Jayant Patil, Tao Lu, Himadri Sen Gupta, Jamie E. Padgett, Yousef Mohammadi Darestani, Andrés D. González, Harvey Cutler, Leonardo Dueñas‐Osorio, Omar Nofal, John W. van de Lindt, Nathanael Rosenheim, Elaina J. Sutley, Eun Jeong
Coastal communities face escalating threats from hurricanes, necessitating a shift from descriptive risk assessment to prescriptive, optimized portfolio planning to enhance resilience. This study introduces an integrated decision-support framework that couples high-fidelity, multihazard socio-physical system modeling with a multi-objective optimization model. The framework quantifies the cascading impacts of hurricane-induced wind, storm surge, and waves on a community’s interdependent buildings, transportation network, and high-resolution electric power network (EPN), along with the resulting population dislocation and long-term recovery. It then identifies Pareto-optimal portfolios of mitigation strategies by simultaneously minimizing three competing objectives—economic loss, population dislocation, and recovery time—under various budget constraints. The framework is applied to a case study of Galveston Island, Texas, under a representative 100-year hurricane scenario. Results demonstrate that the framework can reveal the inherent trade-offs between protecting property value versus minimizing social disruption and identify retrofitting strategies associated with them. A post-processing analysis using a Computable General Equilibrium (CGE) model and social equity metrics further reveals that while optimized mitigation provides system-wide economic co-benefits, improvements in social equity are not guaranteed and require explicit consideration. By translating complex simulation outputs into a portfolio of actionable, resource-efficient strategies, this work provides a powerful tool for stakeholders to make informed, priority-driven investments to enhance coastal community resilience.