科研速览 · Science Skim继续刷下去 · Keep skimming →
◆ European journal of radiology2026-08-25

Ai-assisted compressed sensing with deep learning reconstruction for accelerated rectal MRI: A prospective intra-individual study of image quality and preoperative staging.

Yuedi Ma, Dongqiu Shan, Junhui Yuan, Xiaoxian Zhang, Dechang Yuan, Guangguang An, Nannan Zhao, Zhikai Zhang, Yifan Liu, Xuejun Chen, Yue Wu, Chunmiao Xu

一句话结论 · In one sentence

ACS reduced acquisition time, while ACS-DLR improved subjective image quality. ACS-H improved T-stage and MRF assessment and increased EMVI sensitivity, whereas N-stage accuracy did not improve significantly.

原始摘要(英文原文)· Original abstract
OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to compare image quality and diagnostic performance between artificial intelligence-assisted compressed sensing (ACS) images reconstructed using deep learning reconstruction (ACS-DLR) and conventional parallel imaging (PI) images in rectal cancer MRI. METHODS: 107 patients with biopsy-proven rectal cancer were included. MRI included conventional PI and ACS acquisitions, with the ACS raw data reconstructed at three deep learning reconstruction strength levels (ACS-L, ACS-M, and ACS-H). Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were compared across four image sets using the Friedman test. Subjective image quality was assessed using a 5-point Likert scale for overall image quality, noise, artefact, and edge sharpness. Interobserver agreement for objective metrics was measured by ICC, and for subjective metrics by Cohen's kappa. Diagnostic performance was evaluated using postoperative histopathology, including T stage, N stage, extramural venous invasion (EMVI), and mesorectal fascia (MRF) involvement. RESULTS: ACS reduced acquisition time by 50 % (from 3 min 20 s to 1 min 40 s). Lesion SNR did not differ significantly among the four image sets (P > 0.05), but ACS-H showed the highest muscle SNR. CNR showed significant differences in selected pairwise comparisons. ACS-H achieved the highest subjective scores for overall image quality, noise reduction, and lesion edge sharpness. In the surgical subcohort, ACS-H improved T staging accuracy (P = 0.010; P = 0.018), MRF involvement assessment (P = 0.004; P = 0.012), and EMVI sensitivity (P = 0.039; P = 0.041). N staging accuracy was not significantly different (P = 0.521; P = 0.841). CONCLUSION: ACS reduced acquisition time, while ACS-DLR improved subjective image quality. ACS-H improved T-stage and MRF assessment and increased EMVI sensitivity, whereas N-stage accuracy did not improve significantly.
读原文 · Read the paper ↗

AI 追问PRO

登录后使用 AI 追问

讨论区

登录后参与讨论

相关论文 · Related

Ai-assisted compressed sensing with deep learning reconstruction for accelerated rectal MRI: A prospective intra-individual study of image quality and preoperative staging. — 科研速览 Science Skim