Simona Casalino, Enza Scarlato, Marina Crespo Cruz, Christoph Gerdes, Anna Sordo, Alberto Quinzii, Camilla Zecchetto, Luisa Messineo, Ester Tasselli, Lucia Mendo, Anna Saborowski, John Bridgewater, Arndt Vogel, Davide Melisi
Futibatinib demonstrates clinically meaningful activity after progression on non-covalent FGFR inhibitors, supporting its use in FGFR2-rearranged iCCA, including in the post-non-covalent inhibitor setting. The distinct resistance patterns provide a biological rationale for the continued efficacy of covalent FGFR inhibition. Prospective studies incorporating longitudinal molecular profiling are needed to optimize treatment sequencing.
PURPOSE: The optimal sequencing of non-covalent and covalent FGFR inhibitors in FGFR2-rearranged intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) remains undefined. Futibatinib, an irreversible FGFR1-4 inhibitor, may retain activity in the setting of acquired resistance to non-covalent FGFR inhibitors, but data on the patterns of acquired alterations are limited.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective multicenter study across three European centers including patients with advanced FGFR2-rearranged iCCA treated with futibatinib after progression on non-covalent FGFR inhibitors. Clinical outcomes and safety were evaluated. Available genomic profiling at progression was analyzed to characterize resistance mechanisms and their association with outcomes.
RESULTS: Sixteen patients were included. Median progression-free survival (mPFS) with prior non-covalent FGFR inhibitors was 10.2 months (95% CI 7.0-15.5), with an objective response rate (ORR) of 60.0%. Among patients with post-progression genomic profiling (n = 11), all harbored FGFR2 resistance mutations, with polyclonal alterations (≥2) in 45.5%. A higher burden of FGFR2 mutations and the presence of co-alterations were associated with shorter mPFS on non-covalent inhibitors. Futibatinib was administered at a median of fourth-line therapy. ORR was 31.3% and disease control rate was 50.0%. Median PFS and overall survival were 4.5 months (95% CI 2.0-9.1) and 9.9 months (95% CI 5.7-not reached), respectively. Notably, outcomes with futibatinib were independent of the number of acquired FGFR2 resistance mutations, and the adverse impact of co-alterations appeared attenuated. Safety was consistent with the known profile.
CONCLUSIONS: Futibatinib demonstrates clinically meaningful activity after progression on non-covalent FGFR inhibitors, supporting its use in FGFR2-rearranged iCCA, including in the post-non-covalent inhibitor setting. The distinct resistance patterns provide a biological rationale for the continued efficacy of covalent FGFR inhibition. Prospective studies incorporating longitudinal molecular profiling are needed to optimize treatment sequencing.