S. Falk, David Ekchajzer, Thibault Pirson, Etienne Lees-Perasso, Augustin Wattiez, Lisa Biber‐Freudenberger, Sasha Luccioni, Aimee van Wynsberghe
The rapid expansion of AI has intensified concerns about its environmental sustainability. Current assessments focus on operational carbon emissions using secondary data, overlooking impacts in other life cycle stages. This study presents a comprehensive, multi-criteria life cycle assessment of AI training, building on an innovative life cycle inventory methodology for electronic products that combines physical teardown and multi-element composition analysis. Results for GPT-4 training show the use phase dominates 10 categories, contributing 96% to climate change and fossil fuel depletion. Manufacturing dominates 6 categories, including human toxicity (94%) and freshwater eutrophication (81%). The GPU chip is the largest contributor in 10 categories, particularly climate change (81%) and fossil resource use (80%). While primary data produces modest changes in carbon estimates, substantial variations emerge elsewhere, e.g. minerals and metals depletion increases by 33%. This analysis expands Sustainable AI discourse beyond carbon emissions, challenging current sustainability narratives.