科研速览 · Science Skim继续刷下去 · Keep skimming →
◆ Digestive and liver disease : official journal of the Italian Society of Gastroenterology and the Italian Association for the Study of the Liver2026-09-23

Acute cholecystopancreatitis: Diagnostic accuracy, true frequency, and clinical implications. Insights from the RELAPSTONE multicentre cohort.

Raúl Velamazán, Marta Fernandez-Arquillue, Juan Lerma-Irureta, Daniel Oyón, Anna Arnau, Daniel Abad Baroja, Pablo López-Guillén, Samuel J Martínez-Domínguez, Guillermo García-Rayado, Judith Millastre Bocos, Jose Manuel Ramia, Enrique de-Madaria

一句话结论 · In one sentence

CCP is relatively frequent in current practice, but a proportion of cases are misclassified. In most cases, both conditions present simultaneously, and CCP was not consistently associated with worse clinical outcomes or greater disease severity than isolated AP or ACC. Accurate classification is essential to avoid unnecessary antibiotic use and optimize timing of cholecystectomy.

原始摘要(英文原文)· Original abstract
BACKGROUND: Cholecystopancreatitis (CCP)-the concurrent presentation of acute biliary pancreatitis (AP) and acute calculous cholecystitis (ACC)-remains poorly characterised and is often diagnosed without adherence to validated criteria. Its true prevalence and clinical implications remain uncertain. AIM: To determine the true frequency of CCP and to characterise its diagnostic, clinical, and temporal profile. METHODS: Post-hoc analysis of the international multicentre RELAPSTONE cohort, applying strict diagnostic validation. Variables were compared across AP, ACC and CCP groups using bivariate and multivariable analyses. RESULTS: Among 3,016 patients, 135 were initially labelled as CCP; leaving 117 (3,9%) confirmed cases after validation. Confirmed CCP represented 11.1% of AP and 12.3% of ACC cases. Most cases (65%) presented simultaneously. Although patients with CCP showed slightly higher rates of organ failure, there were no differences in ICU admission rates or length of hospital stay between patients with CCP and those with isolated AP or ACC. CONCLUSION: CCP is relatively frequent in current practice, but a proportion of cases are misclassified. In most cases, both conditions present simultaneously, and CCP was not consistently associated with worse clinical outcomes or greater disease severity than isolated AP or ACC. Accurate classification is essential to avoid unnecessary antibiotic use and optimize timing of cholecystectomy.
读原文 · Read the paper ↗

AI 追问PRO

登录后使用 AI 追问

讨论区

登录后参与讨论

相关论文 · Related

Acute cholecystopancreatitis: Diagnostic accuracy, true frequency, and clinical implications. Insights from the RELAPSTONE multicentre cohort. — 科研速览 Science Skim