科研速览 · Science Skim继续刷下去 · Keep skimming →
◆ Diabetes research and clinical practice2026-08-11

Contemporary automated insulin delivery systems in older adults with type 1 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Piyush Ratan, Marconi Abreu, Luisa Saldarriaga, Hilária Saugo Faria, Talita Trevisan

原始摘要(英文原文)· Original abstract
Older adults with type 1 diabetes are clinically heterogeneous, with variable cognition, dexterity, comorbidity burden, caregiver support, and prior technology experience. Evidence on automated insulin delivery systems (AIDs) in this population remains limited and largely observational. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of contemporary AIDs in adults aged ≥60 years with type 1 diabetes. We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov through February 2026. Nine studies (7 observational studies and 2 randomized crossover trials; 8,765 participants) were included. We pooled outcomes during AID use using single-arm random-effects meta-analyses. When baseline data were available, we performed change-from-baseline analyses. With AIDs, pooled mean time in range (TIR) was 77.95% (95% CI 75.31-80.59), HbA1c was 6.95% (52 mmol/mol) (95% CI 6.67-7.24), and time below range (TBR) < 70 mg/dL was 1.35% (95% CI 1.12-1.57). From baseline, AID use was associated with higher TIR, lower hyperglycemia, lower HbA1c (MD - 0.36%; 95% CI - 0.63 to - 0.09), and lower diabetes distress, without increased hypoglycemia. Findings were consistent in direction with broader AID literature. Older age alone should not preclude individualized AID use.
读原文 · Read the paper ↗

AI 追问PRO

登录后使用 AI 追问

讨论区

登录后参与讨论

相关论文 · Related

Contemporary automated insulin delivery systems in older adults with type 1 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. — 科研速览 Science Skim