科研速览 · Science Skim继续刷下去 · Keep skimming →
◆ Clinical imaging2026-09-04

Validation of ST-RADS calculator: AI web tool for soft tissue-RADS implementation in de novo non-operated tumors and tumor-like lesions.

Shyam Ramachandran, Ria Chhabra, Yahya Kharbat, Sadeem Lodhi, Yin Xi, Behrang Amini, Shivani Ahlawat, Ty Subhawong, Johnathan Samet, Avneesh Chhabra

一句话结论 · In one sentence

The ST-RADS calculator with text-based input achieved accuracy comparable to expert MSK radiologists, while image-only approaches require further refinement. This tool can support routine ST-RADS implementation in clinical practice.

原始摘要(英文原文)· Original abstract
PURPOSE: Soft-tissue RADS (ST-RADS) is an ACR-sponsored MRI-based scoring system for risk-stratification of soft tissue tumors and tumor-like lesions. Despite strong interobserver agreement and diagnostic accuracy, clinical adoption is limited by reader fatigue and workflow burden. We developed and validated an AI-based web tool (ST-RADS calculator) using ST-RADS algorithms and GPT API to facilitate routine implementation. METHODS: The ST-RADS calculator offers three input modes: image-only, text features-only, and combined. A retrospective study of 134 histopathology-confirmed soft tissue tumors compared ST-RADS scores from four fellowship-trained musculoskeletal (MSK) radiologists against the calculator using all three approaches. Sensitivity and specificity were compared using generalized estimating equations with pairwise contrasts. RESULTS: Sensitivity was similar across all methods: 85% for radiologists, 86% for image-only, 81% for text features-only, and 86% for combined (p > 0.90). Specificity differed significantly: 76.5% for radiologists, 69.4% for text features-only, 61.2% for combined, and 25.5% for image-only. Text features-only did not differ significantly from radiologists (p = 0.46). Dichotomized accuracy (benign 1-3 vs. malignant 4-5) was 71% for radiologists, 72% for text features-only, 61% for combined, and 42% for image-only. Full-scale accuracy ranged from 19% (image-only) to 52% (combined). CONCLUSION: The ST-RADS calculator with text-based input achieved accuracy comparable to expert MSK radiologists, while image-only approaches require further refinement. This tool can support routine ST-RADS implementation in clinical practice.
读原文 · Read the paper ↗

AI 追问PRO

登录后使用 AI 追问

讨论区

登录后参与讨论

相关论文 · Related

Validation of ST-RADS calculator: AI web tool for soft tissue-RADS implementation in de novo non-operated tumors and tumor-like lesions. — 科研速览 Science Skim