Wuquan Li, Yunfeng Liang, Jinrong Cao, Yoshihiro Masuda, Takeshi Tsuji, Kohei Tamura, Tomoaki Ishiwata, Daisuke Kuramoto, Toshifumi Matsuoka
This review provides methodological guidance for simulations and experiments and supports future efforts in shale energy development and CO 2 sequestration.
Shale gas has received considerable attention as a clean and high-quality energy resource, while CO 2 injection into shale reservoirs is increasingly explored for its potential to enhance CH 4 recovery and reduce emissions. Shale exhibits a wide pore size distribution, with micropores (<2 nm) and mesopores (2-50 nm). This review explores three key aspects of shale gas research: gas-in-place (GIP), production mechanisms, and CO 2 storage potential with emphasis on significance of both micropores and mesopores. First, the pore morphology and topology characterization using techniques such as electron microscopy, probe gas adsorption, and connectivity analysis were reviewed. Reservoir conditions, shale characteristics, and gas compositions of six typical shale reservoirs were summarized. Second, the gas states in shale nanopores, including free, adsorbed, and absorbed phases, were evaluated due to their importance in estimating GIP. The sorption isotherms for the six representative shale reservoirs, adsorption models, and excess-to-absolute conversion methods were summarized. Molecular simulation models were also reviewed and compared to elucidate adsorption mechanisms at the nano scale, highlighting kerogen models with both micropores and mesopores that better represent experimental adsorption behavior. Third, production mechanisms and CO 2 storage potential were reviewed. Field tests, experiments, and molecular simulations on CO 2 huff-n-puff were summarized. CO 2 injection in shale can effectively enhance CH 4 recovery and store CO 2 , due to its higher affinity compared to CH 4 . Formation-specific and global CO 2 storage potential of shale were analyzed. Based on our previous molecular simulation and the assumption that technically recoverable CH 4 can be replaced by CO 2 , we estimated the global shale CO 2 storage capacity to exceed 570 Gt. This review provides methodological guidance for simulations and experiments and supports future efforts in shale energy development and CO 2 sequestration.