科研速览 · Science Skim继续刷下去 · Keep skimming →
◆ BMJ open gastroenterology2026-09-22

Clinical characteristics and treatment patterns of elderly versus non-elderly adults with inflammatory bowel disease in Brazil: a cross-sectional study.

Vanessa Teixeira Martins Campos, Genalva de Almeida Couto, Valdiana Cristina Surlo, Raisa Araújo Lisboa, Jaciane Araujo Mota, Andrea Maia Pimentel, Neogélia Pereira de Almeida Morais, Flora Maria Lorenzo Fortes, Adriana Ribas Andrade, Bruno Cesar da Silva, Gustavo Gabriel Silva Cardoso, João Vitor Xavier Santos, Maria Luisa Rocha Terencio, Erick Santos Nery, Lidiane Matos Almeida Moura, Adam Cheifetz, Genoile Oliveira Santana

一句话结论 · In one sentence

Elderly patients were less likely to receive biologic and immunosuppressive therapy despite similar disease activity and had substantially greater comorbidity burden and polypharmacy. These findings suggest that therapeutic decisions in older adults should incorporate frailty and comorbidity assessment to support individualised age-adapted management.

原始摘要(英文原文)· Original abstract
OBJECTIVE: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is increasingly diagnosed in older adults, but data from Latin America remain limited. This study aimed to compare the clinical, phenotypic and therapeutic characteristics of elderly and non-elderly adults with IBD in Brazil. METHODS: This cross-sectional study included adults with confirmed Crohn's disease (CD) or ulcerative colitis (UC) attending an IBD clinic in Brazil. Patients were stratified as elderly (≥60 years) or non-elderly (<60 years); elderly individuals were further categorised according to age at diagnosis (<60 years vs ≥60 years). Clinical, therapeutic and frailty-related data were collected from medical records and structured interviews. The primary outcome was biologic therapy use. RESULTS: 450 patients were included in the study (115 elderly, 335 non-elderly). UC was more common among the elderly patients (77.4% vs 56.7%, p<0.001). Elderly patients had higher comorbidity scores (2.6 vs 0.3 for CD; 2.6 vs 0.4 for UC; p<0.001) and greater polypharmacy (21.7% vs 3.3%, p<0.001) but similar disease activity (CD: Harvey-Bradshaw Index <5, 92.2% vs 79.3%; UC: Mayo Score <2, 88.6% vs 78.3%). They received fewer biologics (26.1% vs 43.6%, p=0.001) and immunosuppressants (22.6% vs 47.5%, p<0.001). Among elderly patients, immunosuppressant use was lower in those diagnosed at ≥60 years (2.9% vs 30.9%, p=0·001). Most elderly patients (82.3%) were robust according to the Clinical Frailty Scale. CONCLUSION: Elderly patients were less likely to receive biologic and immunosuppressive therapy despite similar disease activity and had substantially greater comorbidity burden and polypharmacy. These findings suggest that therapeutic decisions in older adults should incorporate frailty and comorbidity assessment to support individualised age-adapted management.
读原文 · Read the paper ↗

AI 追问PRO

登录后使用 AI 追问

讨论区

登录后参与讨论

相关论文 · Related

Clinical characteristics and treatment patterns of elderly versus non-elderly adults with inflammatory bowel disease in Brazil: a cross-sectional study. — 科研速览 Science Skim