Bojan Grenko, Wiebren de Jong, Robert Van De Ketterij, Lindert van Biert
• Dynamic operation of fixed bed reactors is becoming increasingly common • Unsteady 1D models do not capture heat transfer limitations in packed beds • Dynamic instrumental analytical techniques are needed but complex and expensive Recent research in chemical plant operation shows increasing interest in dynamic process operation as part of designed operating strategy for reasons such as increased dependency on renewable energy, and process intensification. Conventional analyses of fixed bed reactors are developed for steady state optimization and may not be adequate for dynamic operation. In fact, the important metrics and targets in dynamic process design are not entirely clear. The first objective of this article is to provide a state-of-the-art survey categorize types of dynamic operation, and rank the available common modelling and analytical tools suitable for quantification of dynamic process variables. The article then examines a case study of 1D and 2D model differences in a methanol steam reforming reactor. The case study shows model prediction differences of up to 15% for conversion, and up to 50% for CO concentration at the outlet during extreme load changes. The study concludes that the complexity of analytical and numerical techniques for dynamic processes is notably higher compared to steady state analyses, but appropriate tools and procedures are currently lacking.