科研速览 · Science Skim继续刷下去 · Keep skimming →
◆ American journal of surgery2026-07-17

Prevalence and predictors of low-acuity interfacility transfer in minimal injury severity geriatric trauma patients.

Arnav Mahajan, Priyash Hafiz, Jiwook Shin, Avaneesh Bellampalli, Emma West, Pooja Podugu, Justin Dvorak, Vanessa P Ho

一句话结论 · In one sentence

Many geriatric transfers involve minimal resource use; while many are clinically justified, this underscores the need for validated, age-specific triage tools incorporating injury phenotype to guide transfer decisions.

原始摘要(英文原文)· Original abstract
BACKGROUND: Interfacility transfer (IFT) may expose older adults to potentially unnecessary care transitions. METHODS: Using ACS TQIP data (2019-2022), we identified patients aged ≥65 years with Injury Severity Score (ISS) ≤9. Low-acuity transfer required no ICU admission, ventilation, early transfusion, stay >48 h, or unfavorable disposition. Maximum Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) severity was summarized by body region. RESULTS: Among 207,875 patients, 54,236 (26.1%) underwent transfer, of whom 7713 (14.2%) met low-acuity criteria. Younger age, male sex, and non-fall mechanism predicted low-acuity transfer; payer disparities persisted. Serious head injury was equally common across acuity groups (head AIS ≥3, 5.8% each), whereas severe lower-extremity injury was less frequent in low-acuity transfers (3.3% vs 25.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Many geriatric transfers involve minimal resource use; while many are clinically justified, this underscores the need for validated, age-specific triage tools incorporating injury phenotype to guide transfer decisions.
读原文 · Read the paper ↗

AI 追问PRO

登录后使用 AI 追问

讨论区

登录后参与讨论

相关论文 · Related

Prevalence and predictors of low-acuity interfacility transfer in minimal injury severity geriatric trauma patients. — 科研速览 Science Skim