Nita Limdi, T. Mark Beasley, Josh Cortopassi, B. Davis, Hana Bangash, Jingheng Chen, Rex L. Chisholm, Wendy K. Chung, James J. Cimino, J. D. R. Connolly, David R. Crosslin, Kyle Davis, Alanna DiVietro, Edward D. Esplin, Bob Freimuth, A. Gordon, Hakon Hakonarson, Marwan Hamed, Megan He, Christin Hoell, Ingrid Holm, George Hripscak, M. Ryan Irvin, GP Jarvik, Dean Karavite, Elizabeth W. Karlson, Eimear E. Kenny, Atlas Khan, Krzysztof Kiryluk, Sarah Knerr, Bruce R. Korf, Leah Kottyan, Iftikhar Kullo, Katie Larkin, Niall J. Lennon, Jodell E. Linder, Teri A. Manolio, Lisa Martin, Elizabeth M. McNally, Jennifer Morse, S. Murphy, Bahram Namjou, Jacqueline A. Odgis, Lori Orlando, Jennifer Pacheco, Josh F. Peterson, Daniel E. Pineda-Alvarez, Cindy Prows, Megan J Puckelwartz, Jasmine Purcell, Laura J. Rasmussen-Torvik, Heidi Rehm, Dan M. Roden, Elisabeth A. Rosenthal, Robb Rowley, Maya Sabatello, DJ Schaid, Richard R. Sharp, Johanna L. Smith, Jordan W. Smoller, Emily R. Soper, Rene Sterling, Sabrina A. Suckiel, Shannon Terek, Jeritt G. Thayer, Yi-Lee Ting, Hemant Tiwari, Digna Velez-Edwards, Kavishwar B. Wagholikar, Theresa L. Walunas, W. Q. Wei, Chunua Weng, Georgia L. Wiesner, Noura S. Abul-Husn, DL Veenstra
The Electronic Medical Records and Genomics (eMERGE) Network developed and implemented a genome-informed risk assessment (GIRA) to communicate genomic (polygenic risk scores [PRSs], integrated risk scores [IRSs], and monogenic results), clinical, and family history-based risk for 11 chronic diseases and provide recommended healthcare recommendations. GIRA reports have now been returned to 23,840 participants and their providers in a large prospective cohort study. We present here the study design and analysis framework for assessing the attributable impact of GIRA return. Pre-specified outcomes include (1) provider/participant adoption of recommended healthcare actions, (2) new diagnosis of disease, (3) treatment initiation/intensification, and (4) clinical outcomes (surrogate markers or clinical events). We assess outcomes in high risk vs. not-high-risk participants, adjusting for covariates. We evaluate the effect of PRS/IRS at pre-established high-risk thresholds using regression discontinuity (RD), a quasi-experimental method that mimics randomization near a cutoff, enabling estimation of causal effects and controlling for unobserved confounders. Monogenic and family history-based risk stratification are analyzed using logistic regression. With 23,840 participants and 12 months of follow-up, the study is powered to detect differences of 2%-11% with 80% power (α = 0.05 in the adoption outcome). Longer follow-up will be required to enable assessment of new disease diagnosis, treatment changes, and clinical outcomes. Through innovative RD analyses and defined outcomes and comparison groups, this study will provide new insights into the real-world clinical impact of genomic risk assessment, address critical evidence gaps, advance understanding of genomic medicine outcomes, and inform future research.