科研速览 · Science Skim继续刷下去 · Keep skimming →
◆ The American journal of emergency medicine2026-09-15

The 2026 Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines: The dissenting opinion.

Rory Spiegel, Korbin Haycock, Ashley Miller, Scott Weingart, Joshua Farkas, Ian Ajmo, Philippe Rola

原始摘要(英文原文)· Original abstract
The Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC) Guidelines once represented what was considered the pinnacle of care for patients with sepsis and septic shock. Unfortunately, over the past decade, successive iterations of the guidelines have drifted from what is now considered optimal care for critically ill patients with sepsis and septic shock. Moreover, the guidelines have shifted from recommendations intended to guide and support physicians based on the best available evidence, to mandated "bundles" which exert substantial influence over what is considered "standard of care" in sepsis management. This. Document is intended to serve as a refutation of sorts. A rebuttal to the most controversial and influential recommendations in the Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines, while also offering guidance on how clinicians might move beyond the protocolized, metric-based care that has become the current standard promoted by the SSC and similar organizations.
读原文 · Read the paper ↗

AI 追问PRO

登录后使用 AI 追问

讨论区

登录后参与讨论

相关论文 · Related

The 2026 Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines: The dissenting opinion. — 科研速览 Science Skim