科研速览 · Science Skim继续刷下去 · Keep skimming →
◆ Alexandria Engineering Journal2026-05-01· Sentence

GDBERT-score: Semantic Graph-Enhanced DeBERTa for automated essay scoring in higher education

Tiantian Mi, Tianjiao Yu

原始摘要(英文原文)· Original abstract
Automated essay scoring (AES) systems typically rely on either sequential text models for contextual semantics or graph-based approaches for discourse structure, but rarely integrate both effectively. We present GDBERT-Score, a hybrid architecture that combines DeBERTa’s disentangled attention with graph convolutional networks (GCN) for holistic essay scoring. Each essay is represented as a sentence-level semantic graph, where nodes are DeBERTa mean-pooled sentence embeddings and edges connect sentence pairs whose cosine similarity exceeds a learned threshold ( τ = 0 . 4 ). GCN-derived structural embeddings are concatenated with DeBERTa’s document-level contextual embedding and fused through a progressive reduction network ( 896 → 512 → 256 → 128 ) to produce a final holistic score. Evaluated on the Kaggle Automated Essay Scoring 2.0 benchmark via six-fold cross-validation, GDBERT-Score achieves QWK = 0.7777 ± 0.0017 (mean ± std across 5 random seeds), significantly outperforming both the DeBERTa-only baseline ( p < 0 . 0001 ) and the TF–IDF graph variant ( p = 0 . 0010 ). Ablation experiments reveal that node feature quality, rather than graph topology, is the primary determinant of GCN effectiveness in automated essay scoring: replacing surface-level node features with DeBERTa sentence embeddings yields significant improvements over both the DeBERTa-only baseline ( Δ QWK = +0.0294, p < 0 . 0001 ) and the graph-augmented variant ( Δ QWK = +0.0239, p = 0 . 0010 ), confirmed across five random seeds (QWK = 0.7777 ± 0.0017).
读原文 · Read the paper ↗

AI 追问PRO

登录后使用 AI 追问

讨论区

登录后参与讨论

相关论文 · Related

GDBERT-score: Semantic Graph-Enhanced DeBERTa for automated essay scoring in higher education — 科研速览 Science Skim