科研速览 · Science Skim继续刷下去 · Keep skimming →
◆ Annals of anatomy = Anatomischer Anzeiger : official organ of the Anatomische Gesellschaft2026-09-06

Volumetric Symmetry of Maxillary Tooth Roots: A Cone Beam Computed Tomography Based Study Using Manual-Assisted Segmentation.

Cody Pewarchuk, Hassem Geha, Taraneh Maghsoodi-Zahedi, Nikolaos Shinas, Shaza Abass, Sandra Andari

一句话结论 · In one sentence

Maxillary root dimensions differ by sex, with no statistically significant side effects for root volume, length, or bucco-palatal and mesio-distal widths. For root length, equivalence testing did not establish equivalence within the prespecified ±0.20-mm margin. Clinical research using symmetry should consider stratifying data by sex to ensure that sex-related anatomical differences are not mistaken for clinical pathology. Ultimately, this study provides a valuable baseline knowledge of symmetry that can be used in future research.

原始摘要(英文原文)· Original abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate bilateral symmetry in root volume, length, mesiodistal (M/D) and buccopalatal (B/P) widths of maxillary permanent teeth anterior to the first molars. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This cross-sectional study analyzed CBCT data from 189 subjects (93 males and 96 females) with mean age 38.18 ± 8.08 years. Inclusion criteria required fully developed apices and no history of trauma, orthodontic treatment, or craniofacial anomalies. One investigator performed manual-assisted segmentation on 1,202 maxillary incisors, canines, and premolars. Root volume (mm3) root length (mm), M/D width (mm), and B/P width (mm) were measured. A linear mixed-effects model assessed bilateral symmetry. RESULTS: Males exhibited significantly greater root dimensions than females across all measured parameters (p < 0.001). After adjusting for biologic sex and tooth type, no significant main effect of side was observed for root volume (p = 0.196), root length (p = 0.714), or bucco-palatal root width (p = 0.381). A potential side effect was observed for mesiodistal root width (p = 0.014), although this did not meet the prespecified significance threshold of p < 0.01. CONCLUSIONS: Maxillary root dimensions differ by sex, with no statistically significant side effects for root volume, length, or bucco-palatal and mesio-distal widths. For root length, equivalence testing did not establish equivalence within the prespecified ±0.20-mm margin. Clinical research using symmetry should consider stratifying data by sex to ensure that sex-related anatomical differences are not mistaken for clinical pathology. Ultimately, this study provides a valuable baseline knowledge of symmetry that can be used in future research.
读原文 · Read the paper ↗

AI 追问PRO

登录后使用 AI 追问

讨论区

登录后参与讨论

相关论文 · Related

Volumetric Symmetry of Maxillary Tooth Roots: A Cone Beam Computed Tomography Based Study Using Manual-Assisted Segmentation. — 科研速览 Science Skim