科研速览 · Science Skim继续刷下去 · Keep skimming →
◆ AMBIO2025-10-23· Environmental resource management

Pathways for Ukraine’s post-war nature recovery: Focus on forest socio-ecological systems

Mariana Melnykovych, Maria Nijnik, Oleksandr Soshenskyi, Sergiy Zibtsev, Ganna Lobchenko, Simo Sarkki, Natalia Voloshyna, Ihor Soloviy, Pavlo Kravets, Yevhenii Khan, Roman Yaroshchuk, William S. Keeton, Christian Rosset, Bernhard Pauli, Claude García, Patrick O. Waeber

原始摘要(英文原文)· Original abstract
Natural ecosystems face significant pressure from climate change, biodiversity loss, and increasing socio-economic and political stressors-all of which are exacerbated by military conflict. This paper focuses on Ukraine and examines the root causes of disturbances in the country's forest socio-ecological systems (SES), as well as the impacts of the ongoing war, to identify recovery pathways. Using a multi-method approach, we assess factors affecting Ukraine's forest SES and identify three key recovery pathways: (1) an economic focus through forest use for low-carbon recovery, including timber for reconstruction and small-scale energy production; (2) a "close-to-nature and close-to-people" approach, leveraging digital tools and innovations for climate-resilient recovery; and (3) anticipatory governance and socio-ecological innovation. Relying on a single pathway risks long-term vulnerability. We highlight that integrating recovery pathways creates synergies. Coordinated actions within Ukraine and from international actors are essential to enable a recovery aligned with "build back better" principles. Our findings offer valuable insights for Ukraine and other conflict-affected regions.
读原文 · Read the paper ↗

AI 追问PRO

登录后使用 AI 追问

讨论区

登录后参与讨论

相关论文 · Related

Pathways for Ukraine’s post-war nature recovery: Focus on forest socio-ecological systems — 科研速览 Science Skim