科研速览 · Science Skim继续刷下去 · Keep skimming →
◆ Quality of Life Research2026-06-06· Prom

Physiotherapist and nurse perspectives on the acceptability and timing of patient-reported outcome measures in clinical practice: Balancing standardisation and flexibility

Jessica Nikolovski, Marika Franklin, Rachael L. Morton, Matilda Armstrong, Gill Hartas, Brad Rossiter, M S Fagan, Melissa Tinsley, Jean-Frederic Levesque, Kim Sutherland, Rebecca Mercieca-Bebber, Claire Snyder, Olalekan Lee Aiyegbusi, Rhonda Power, Thelma De Lisser-Howarth, John Paul Troiani, Jane Maher, Joanne Leonard, Katrina Elias, Claudia Rutherford

原始摘要(英文原文)· Original abstract
PURPOSE: Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), when used at the point-of-care, provide a mechanism to systematically integrate patients' voices into shared decision-making. We examined clinicians' perspectives on the acceptability and preferred timing of PROM completion in routine clinical care for respiratory, musculoskeletal, cardiac, kidney and diabetic condition management. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted over videoconference between October 2024 and May 2025. Participants worked at various New South Wales Health clinics, providing care for patients with chronic conditions, and were eligible to collect and review PROMs digitally using the Health Outcomes Patient Experience platform (NSW PRMs-HOPE program). Reflexive thematic analysis was undertaken. RESULTS: Twenty-two physiotherapists and nurses were interviewed. Acceptability themes included: (1) purpose of PROMs; (2) broader ethical considerations for PROMs collection and use; (3) practical aspects of PROM administration. Findings highlighted the elusiveness of an "ideal" timing for PROMs. Timing themes included: (1) (mis)alignment in timing of PROM administration; (2) preferences for fixed or customised timing and frequency of administration; (3) temporal fit and workflow alignment. CONCLUSION: PROMs were reported as most acceptable when their selection, content, and timing aligned with clinical purpose, scope of practice, and existing workflows. Flexibility in PROM administration was perceived to enhance relevance at the point-of-care and support timely, condition-specific clinical conversations and interventions. However, clinicians also recognised that increased flexibility may reduce the comparability of aggregated PROM data across cohorts, highlighting an inherent acceptability trade-off between meeting individual clinical needs and supporting system-level performance monitoring and benchmarking.
读原文 · Read the paper ↗

AI 追问PRO

登录后使用 AI 追问

讨论区

登录后参与讨论

相关论文 · Related

Physiotherapist and nurse perspectives on the acceptability and timing of patient-reported outcome measures in clinical practice: Balancing standardisation and flexibility — 科研速览 Science Skim