科研速览 · Science Skim继续刷下去 · Keep skimming →
◆ Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management2026-06-14· Citric acid

Impacts of (bio)acidification with citric acid or anaerobic fermentation on phosphorus recycling: solubility and diffusion of raw and pyrolyzed biowastes in soil

Henrique Rasera Raniro, Pietro Sica, Clara Kopp, Jakob Magid

原始摘要(英文原文)· Original abstract
Recycling phosphorus (P) from biowaste can improve nutrient circularity. However, low P bioavailability often requires H2SO4-acidification, which is complex to handle and prohibited in organic agriculture under European Union regulations. We tested acidification with citric acid (CA, 0–15%), and bioacidification with either dairy (Arla Cultura®) or silage inoculant (BONSILAGE®FORTE), with and without wheat flour, to increase water-extractable P (WEP) of meat and bone meal (MBM), digestate solid fraction (DSF) from biogas production, and their biochars (BCs). Additionally, 10% citric acid- or Arla + wheat-treated biomaterials were incubated in a one-dimensional slicing device to assess pH and WEP in the fertilized and adjacent (0–8 mm) soil layers. (Bio)acidification decreased pH (up to − 3.28 for BONSILAGE + wheat DSF-BC) and increased WEP (up to + 20.8 g kg–1 for 15% CA DSF), being less efficient in BC variants. When incubated, bioacidified materials promoted comparable or higher soil WEP to citric acid, except for MBM, whose soil WEP was higher under citric acid (+ 134.4 ± 19.5 mg kg–1). While relevant to P recovery, further validation of formulations, agronomic performance and safety is needed to ensure compatibility with organic farming frameworks. Graphical abstract
读原文 · Read the paper ↗

AI 追问PRO

登录后使用 AI 追问

讨论区

登录后参与讨论

相关论文 · Related

Impacts of (bio)acidification with citric acid or anaerobic fermentation on phosphorus recycling: solubility and diffusion of raw and pyrolyzed biowastes in soil — 科研速览 Science Skim