Syed Ahmed, Burhan Mahmood, John Daniel, Sandy Johng, Amy Strong, John Ibrahim, June Hu, Kara Short, Kelsey Montgomery, Keri A. Drake, Kushal Bhakta, Leslie Lusk, Mary Revenis, Pratibha Thakkar, Ruth Seabrook, Samir Pandya, Sarah Keene, Sharada Gowda, Suma Hoffman, Tahagod Mohamed, Tara Beck, Tasnim Najaf, Robert DiGeronimo, Natalie E. Rintoul, Abhishek Makkar
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to characterize practices and decision-making for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) for congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract (CAKUT). METHODS: General practices (GP) section inquired about institutional practices and barriers, ECMO criteria, and dialysis. The hypothetical cases (HC) illustrated four clinical scenarios with varying degrees of renal severity for ECMO candidacy. RESULTS: Then, 99 (42 centers) and 91 (38 centers) physicians completed the GP and HC components, respectively. The majority considered ECMO on a case-by-case basis (66%). Bilateral renal agenesis was the most common diagnosis for exclusion (52%). Prenatal markers used for ECMO exclusion included anhydramnios (43%) and lung volumes (43%). The majority of centers had nephrology involved in ECMO decision-making. Challenges for implementing ECMO included disease heterogeneity (79%) and poor evidence on outcomes (66%). HC responses demonstrated variability in considering ECMO for CAKUT. CONCLUSIONS: Variability among providers and institutes underscores the need for consensus-based guidelines to optimize decision-making and outcomes.