科研速览 · Science Skim继续刷下去 · Keep skimming →
◆ Policy & Internet2026-05-27· Technocracy

The Technopolitical Paradox: Navigating Algorithmic Legitimacy, Participation Facades, and Technocratic Inclusion in Post‐Reformasi Indonesia

Isnaini Muallidin, Hadi Supratikta

原始摘要(英文原文)· Original abstract
ABSTRACT Digital governance in transitional democracies promises enhanced participation but often produces new forms of exclusion. This study examines the “technopolitical paradox” in post‐Reformasi Indonesia, where algorithmic systems expand engagement while reinforcing elite control. Introducing a novel framework of algorithmic legitimacy, participation facades, and technocratic inclusion, the research analyzes how digital technologies reshape political authority. Based on mixed‐methods data, policy analysis, 45 interviews, digital ethnography, and a survey ( n = 1247), the findings reveal that data‐driven claims obscure political choices, participatory platforms simulate engagement without influence, and technical requirements systematically marginalize non‐expert citizens. The study concludes that digital governance risks reproducing inequality behind a meritocratic facade, challenging democratic values in the digital age.
读原文 · Read the paper ↗

AI 追问PRO

登录后使用 AI 追问

讨论区

登录后参与讨论

相关论文 · Related

The Technopolitical Paradox: Navigating Algorithmic Legitimacy, Participation Facades, and Technocratic Inclusion in Post‐Reformasi Indonesia — 科研速览 Science Skim