科研速览 · Science Skim继续刷下去 · Keep skimming →
◆ Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery2026-09-01

Evaluating Dysphonia Referrals to Otolaryngology Providers: Is There a Need For Improved Referral Guideline Implementation?

Rishi Kondapaneni, Kaitlyn Florence, Erika Shock, Nicole Henry, Megan Price, Logan Mays, Jeffrey Bodeen, Bin Ge, Mark R Gilbert

一句话结论 · In one sentence

Referral patterns to otolaryngology physicians for dysphonia do not reflect high fidelity to updated clinical practice guidelines. These findings underscore the limitations of passive dissemination and the need for targeted implementation strategies.

原始摘要(英文原文)· Original abstract
OBJECTIVE: Evaluate referring physicians' adherence to the 2018 Hoarseness/Dysphonia Clinical Practice Guideline when referring to an academic otolaryngology department. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Tertiary academic medical center. METHODS: Adult patients (≥ 18 years old) referred to the University of Missouri Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery for a primary complaint of dysphonia between January 2015 and December 2022 were included. Patients referred from otolaryngologists or primary complaints other than dysphonia were excluded. Demographics, diagnoses, referral reason, and prior management were assessed. Referral practices before and after the 2018 update were examined across recommendations relevant to referring physicians: timely referral, avoidance of pre-laryngoscopy imaging, avoidance of empiric antireflux therapy, corticosteroids, and antibiotics, and performance of laryngoscopy before prescribing voice therapy. Adherence to each recommendation and all recommendations combined was compared between pre- and post-guideline cohorts. RESULTS: In all, 528 patients were included: 141 (26.7%) were referred before and 387 (73.3%) after the 2018 update. Following guideline publication, adherence significantly decreased for timely referral (71.3% vs 80.9%; p = .027), avoidance of imaging (96.6% vs 100%; p = .028), and avoidance of antibiotics (89.7% vs 95.7%; p = .028). No significant changes were observed for antireflux therapy, corticosteroid use, or referral before prescribing voice therapy. Adherence to all analyzed guidelines did not improve (52.5% vs 61.7%; p = .059). CONCLUSION: Referral patterns to otolaryngology physicians for dysphonia do not reflect high fidelity to updated clinical practice guidelines. These findings underscore the limitations of passive dissemination and the need for targeted implementation strategies.
读原文 · Read the paper ↗

AI 追问PRO

登录后使用 AI 追问

讨论区

登录后参与讨论

相关论文 · Related

Evaluating Dysphonia Referrals to Otolaryngology Providers: Is There a Need For Improved Referral Guideline Implementation? — 科研速览 Science Skim