Carmelo José Espinosa-Almanza, Jorge Leonardo Támara-Rivera, Héctor Andrés Ruiz-Ávila
The Istrail et al ultrasound method showed favorable overall performance for noninvasive CVP estimation in critically ill patients. Its low mean bias and good discriminative ability support its use as a complementary bedside tool, although agreement with invasive measurement remains limited.
OBJECTIVES: To validate an ultrasound-based method for noninvasive estimation of central venous pressure (CVP) in critically ill patients and compare its performance with invasively measured CVP.
METHODS: We conducted an analytical cross-sectional study in adults admitted to a general intensive care unit. Patients with a central venous catheter and CVP monitoring through an electronic transducer were included. Ultrasound-estimated CVP (CVPus) was calculated using the method described by Istrail et al, which combines right atrial depth and jugular venous distension height. Correlation, paired mean differences, Bland-Altman agreement, and discriminative performance for invasive CVP thresholds of ≥5 and ≥10 mmHg were assessed.
RESULTS: Seventy-five patients were included; CVPus was feasible in 70. Mean invasive CVP was 5.50 ± 3.80 mmHg; 53.3% of patients had CVP ≥5 mmHg and 21.3% had CVP ≥10 mmHg. CVPus showed a moderate positive correlation with invasive CVP (r = 0.61; p < .001). Mean invasive CVP and mean CVPus were 5.26 and 5.59 mmHg, respectively (p = .375). Bland-Altman analysis showed a mean bias of -0.33 mmHg, with 95% limits of agreement from -6.37 to 5.72 mmHg. The area under the ROC curve was 0.83 (95% CI, 0.68-0.99) for invasive CVP ≥10 mmHg and 0.81 (95% CI, 0.71-0.91) for invasive CVP ≥5 mmHg.
CONCLUSIONS: The Istrail et al ultrasound method showed favorable overall performance for noninvasive CVP estimation in critically ill patients. Its low mean bias and good discriminative ability support its use as a complementary bedside tool, although agreement with invasive measurement remains limited.