Yuhei Iwasa, Akinori Maruta, Keisuke Iwata, Hidetaka Kuroda, Shinya Uemura, Shota Iwata, Yosuke Ohashi, Naoki Mita, Hironao Ichikawa, Masahito Shimizu
There were no significant differences between LD and HD steroid induction in terms of treatment efficacy or long-term outcomes in patients with AIP.
BACKGROUND: Steroids are the first-line treatment for autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP); however, the impact of lower initial doses on relapse remains unclear.
METHODS: Ninety patients were divided into high-dose (HD; > 0.4 mg/kg/day) and low-dose (LD; ≤ 0.4 mg/kg/day) induction groups. The treatment response, relapse rate, and predictors of relapse were evaluated.
RESULTS: Sixty-two and 28 patients received HD and LD steroid induction. The treatment response (100% vs. 100%, p > 0.99), relapse rates (33.9% vs. 32.1%, p > 0.99) and relapse-free survival (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.86; log-rank test, p = 0.99) did not differ significantly between the groups. Multivariable analysis identified discontinuation of maintenance treatment within 3 years (HR: 5.32, p = 0.0004), larger pancreatic volume (HR: 1.02, p = 0.01), and a smaller IgG4 reduction rate at 1 month after initiation of steroid treatment (HR: 0.99, p = 0.02) as independent predictors of relapse. In contrast, LD steroid induction was not identified as a risk factor for relapse (HR: 0.99, p = 0.99).
CONCLUSIONS: There were no significant differences between LD and HD steroid induction in terms of treatment efficacy or long-term outcomes in patients with AIP.