Yunsheng Hou, Jingying Zhang, Shiyun Wang, Kunya Liu, Bingyu Zhang, Hongdu Deng, Rongrong Wang, Ying Xu, Dan Wang, Chuansheng Wang, Tianzhen Chen, Ruiling Zhang
Although the primary craving outcome did not differ significantly among groups, a-iTBS showed preliminary signals of earlier response and longer time to first relapse than sham stimulation. These exploratory findings require confirmation in larger trials.
BACKGROUND: Accelerated intermittent theta-burst stimulation (a-iTBS) is a novel rTMS protocol increasingly used for mental disorders, but its application in alcohol use disorder (AUD) remains early. This exploratory sham-controlled study evaluated a 50-session a-iTBS protocol for AUD.
METHODS: Sixty-one male AUD inpatients were randomized to receive traditional iTBS (once daily, 600 pulse/session), a-iTBS (5 sessions/day, 3000 pulses/day), or sham iTBS. Treatments were administered on 10 weekdays (Monday to Friday over 2 weeks) and targeted the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. The primary outcome was the change in craving. The alcohol relapse behavior, emotional symptoms, and sleep quality were evaluated pre-/post-intervention.
RESULTS: Group showed no significant main effect on craving percentage change. The a-iTBS group showed a higher response rate and earlier response onset than the s-iTBS group, whereas no significant differences existed between a-iTBS and iTBS, or iTBS and s-iTBS. No intergroup differences were detected for mood and sleep indicators. At the 6-month follow-up, participants receiving a-iTBS achieved longer abstinence duration than those given s-iTBS. Exploratory logistic regression indicated that baseline GAD-7 scores and treatment group were associated with treatment response.
CONCLUSIONS: Although the primary craving outcome did not differ significantly among groups, a-iTBS showed preliminary signals of earlier response and longer time to first relapse than sham stimulation. These exploratory findings require confirmation in larger trials.