科研速览 · Science Skim继续刷下去 · Keep skimming →
◆ Frontiers in public health2026-01-01

Risk prediction models for enteral feeding intolerance in critically ill patients: a systematic review.

Yuting Xie, Chunxia Li, Xijun Wu, Chunyan Wang

一句话结论 · In one sentence

Existing risk prediction models for enteral feeding intolerance in critically ill patients demonstrate certain predictive value; however, the methodological quality varies considerably, and external validation is insufficient. Future studies should conduct large-scale, multicenter, prospective research and adopt standardized methodological procedures to develop and validate prediction models, thereby improving their clinical applicability and generalizability.

原始摘要(英文原文)· Original abstract
OBJECTIVE: To systematically evaluate existing risk prediction models for enteral feeding intolerance (EFI) in critically ill patients, with the aim of providing evidence-based references for clinical practice. METHODS: PubMed, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang Database, China Biology Medicine Disc (CBM), and VIP Database were systematically searched from database inception to November 20, 2025. Studies that developed or validated risk prediction models for enteral feeding intolerance in adult critically ill patients were included. Data extraction was conducted using the CHARMS checklist, and the risk of bias and applicability of the included studies were assessed using the PROBAST tool. RESULTS: A total of 25 studies were included, involving 25 risk prediction models for enteral feeding intolerance. Sample sizes ranged from 118 to 1,584 patients, and the incidence of EFI ranged from 26.25 to 61.3%. APACHE II score, blood glucose, mechanical ventilation, age, albumin, and intra-abdominal pressure were relatively frequently reported predictors, but no single predictor was consistently identified across all models. CONCLUSION: Existing risk prediction models for enteral feeding intolerance in critically ill patients demonstrate certain predictive value; however, the methodological quality varies considerably, and external validation is insufficient. Future studies should conduct large-scale, multicenter, prospective research and adopt standardized methodological procedures to develop and validate prediction models, thereby improving their clinical applicability and generalizability. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420261281618, identifier (CRD420261281618).
读原文 · Read the paper ↗

AI 追问PRO

登录后使用 AI 追问

讨论区

登录后参与讨论

相关论文 · Related

Risk prediction models for enteral feeding intolerance in critically ill patients: a systematic review. — 科研速览 Science Skim