科研速览 · Science Skim继续刷下去 · Keep skimming →
◆ Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine2026-01-20· Medicine

Intranasal Treatments for Children With Sleep-Disordered Breathing

Gillian M. Nixon, Deborah J. Anderson, Alice Baker, A. Fiona Davidson, Amanda Griffiths, Anneke Grobler, Gideon D. Pinczower, Joanne Rimmer, Elizabeth Rose, Chris J. Selman, C. J. Simpson, Moya Vandeleur, Kirsten P. Perrett

原始摘要(英文原文)· Original abstract
Importance: Symptoms of obstructive sleep apnea are common in childhood and associated with significant comorbidity. Surgical treatment with adenotonsillectomy is first-line treatment but medical treatments show potential to improve symptoms and reduce the need for surgery. Objective: To determine the efficacy of 6 weeks of intranasal steroid (INS) compared with saline in children with obstructive sleep-disordered breathing (OSDB) with persistent symptoms after a 6-week intranasal saline run-in. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial involving specialist clinic waitlists at 2 sites in Australia. Included were children aged 3 to 12 years. Study data were analyzed from January to June 2025. Interventions: All children received once-daily intranasal saline for 6 weeks (run-in). Those with persisting symptoms (SDB score ≥-1) were randomized to either once-daily intranasal mometasone furoate, 50 µg, (INS) or continued saline for a further 6 weeks. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was symptom resolution (SDB score <-1). Secondary outcomes included behavior, quality of life, and parental perception of need for surgery. Analyses were adjusted for site and baseline measures. Results: A total of 150 children (mean [SD] age, 6.2 [2.3] years; 93 male [62%]) were recruited. Of 139 children who completed the run-in phase, 41 (29.5%) had symptom resolution after saline run-in. Among 93 children randomized to intervention groups (47 INS; 46 saline), symptom resolution occurred in 35.6% (95% CI, 22.9%-50.6%) and 36.4% (95% CI, 23.5%-51.6%) of the INS and saline group, respectively, with no evidence for a clinically significant difference between groups (risk difference, -0.9%; 95% CI, -20.7% to 19.0%; P = .93). No group differences were found in secondary outcomes. Subgroup analysis did not reveal a group more or less likely to respond to medical treatment. Conclusions and Relevance: Results of this randomized clinical trial show that 6 weeks of intranasal saline resolved OSDB symptoms in nearly one-third of children. An additional 6-week course of INS or saline led to resolution in another one-third (total resolution around 50%), with no added benefit from INS. Intranasal saline is an effective short-term first-line treatment for OSDB before consideration of polysomnography or surgical intervention. Results suggest that saline should be recommended for 3 months before assessing the need for specialist referral. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05382494.
读原文 · Read the paper ↗

AI 追问PRO

登录后使用 AI 追问

讨论区

登录后参与讨论

相关论文 · Related

Intranasal Treatments for Children With Sleep-Disordered Breathing — 科研速览 Science Skim