科研速览 · Science Skim继续刷下去 · Keep skimming →
◆ JAMA neurology2026-09-28

Hearing Intervention for Older Adults With Mild Cognitive Impairment: The CHOICE Randomized Clinical Trial.

Ying Chen, Haibo Shi, Mingliang Xiang, Xia Li, Zhili Wang, Wen Lu, Yilin Shen, Yuan Fang, Jie Chen, Lei Guan, Feifan Zhao, Zaichao Wu, Rong Tian, Qiongfei Yu, Kun Han, Haibin Sheng, Shengqi Chen, Jiayu Sun, Guangyu Liu, Hao Wu, CHOICE Collaborative Research Group

一句话结论 · In one sentence

In this study, among older adults with mild cognitive impairment and coexisting hearing loss, a hearing aid intervention did not significantly reduce the incidence of dementia-level impairment at 24 months.

原始摘要(英文原文)· Original abstract
IMPORTANCE: Hearing loss is a significant modifiable risk factor for cognitive decline, but the effectiveness of hearing intervention for cognition stabilization or improvement still remains controversial. OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether hearing intervention could reduce dementia-level impairment incidence in older adults with coexisting hearing loss and mild cognitive impairment (MCI). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This multicenter, parallel-group, open-label randomized clinical trial was conducted between September 2021 and February 2024, with the 24-month follow-up completed in February 2026. This study was conducted at 3 tertiary otology outpatient clinics and 3 CHOICE cohort community health stations in Shanghai, China. Of 21 908 adults aged 60 years or older assessed for eligibility, 703 participants with coexisting MCI (Clinical Dementia Rating [CDR] global score of 0.5) and moderate to severe hearing loss were enrolled and randomized. These data were analyzed from February 2026 to July 2026. INTERVENTIONS: Participants were randomized 1:1 to receive either hearing aid intervention (n = 353) or hearing care education (n = 350). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was the conversion rate from MCI to dementia-level impairment over 24 months, defined as a CDR global score 1 or more. Key prespecified secondary outcomes comprised rate of cognitive improvement (CDR = 0) and CDR global and domain scores. RESULTS: Among 703 randomized patients (mean [SD] age, 74.53 [7.16] years; range, 60-96 years; 250 female [35.56%] and 452 male [64.44%]), 610 (86.77%) completed the trial. No significant difference was observed in the primary outcome, in which the conversion rate from MCI to dementia-level impairment was 3.09% (95% CI, 1.62%-5.74%) in the intervention group vs 4.74% (95% CI, 2.60%-8.29%) in the control group (risk difference [RD], -2.07%; 95% CI, -4.74% to 0.61%; relative risk [RR], 0.59; 95% CI, 0.25-1.38; P = .23). Meanwhile, prespecified secondary analysis demonstrated that hearing intervention increased the rate of cognitive improvement (15.34%; 95% CI, 11.84%-19.62% vs 2.36%; 95% CI, 0.99%-5.22%; RD, 12.00%; 95% CI, 8.79%-15.21%; RR, 5.94; 95% CI, 2.46-14.37). No study-related adverse events were reported. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this study, among older adults with mild cognitive impairment and coexisting hearing loss, a hearing aid intervention did not significantly reduce the incidence of dementia-level impairment at 24 months. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry Identifier: ChiCTR2000036139.
读原文 · Read the paper ↗

AI 追问PRO

登录后使用 AI 追问

讨论区

登录后参与讨论

相关论文 · Related

Hearing Intervention for Older Adults With Mild Cognitive Impairment: The CHOICE Randomized Clinical Trial. — 科研速览 Science Skim